Članek
Uradni model iz Velike Britanije napoveduje: v tretjem valu bo 60-70% hospitaliziranih in umrlih tistih, ki so prejeli dva odmerka COVID-19 cepiva
Objavljeno May 06, 2021

Članek z dne 26. april 2021 

Po projekcijah najvišje agencije združenega kraljestva za modeliranje bo v vrhu tretjega vala COVID-19 60-70% hospitaliziranih in/ali umrlih tistih ljudi, ki so vzeli oba odmerka cepiva. V dokumentu piše, da bodo v bolnišnicah in smrtnih primerih prevladovali tisti, ki so prejeli dva odmerka cepiva, in ki predstavljajo približno 60 % oziroma 70 % tretjega vala.

*

*

Ta model hospitalizacije in smrti v trejem valu COVID-19 je vrhu znanstvenega svetovalnega telesa Združenega kraljestva (SAGE) predstavila ena od njegovih podskupin -Znanstvena operativna skupina za modeliranje pandemije gripe (Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling, Operational (SPI-M-O)).

Ta odbor akademikov je opravil vzorčenje skozi celotno pandemijo in je preučil vpliv cepljenja na sprejem v bolnišnico, okužbe in smrtne primere.

Njihove ugotovitve kažejo, da je tretji val neizogiben, vendar je velikost špice odvisna od učinkovitosti cepiv, hitrosti sproščanja omejitev in vpliva novih variant koronavirusa na prenos in bolezen.

Model kaže, da bodo v bolnišnicah in smrtnih primerih "prevladovali tisti, ki so prejeli dva odmerka COVID-19 cepiva".

»Z ukrepi ohranjanja zmanjšanja prenosov virusa po sprejetju 4. koraka [načrti Anglije za odpravo vseh omejitev od 21. junija dalje], se bo skoraj gotovo zmanjšalo število okužb.« Ta najnovejši model krepi to ugotovitev, saj bi lahko manjša skladnost z osnovnimi ukrepi in posledična povečana prenosljivost virusa pripeljala do vrha v obsegu, kot je bil januarja 2021.

V dokumentu so na voljo številne možnosti, kaj lahko pričakujemo od COVID-19, ko zmanjšujemo omejitve, ki segajo v poletje. Upošteva vrsto različnih virov, vključno z modeliranjem z Univerze v Warwicku, Imperial College London in London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.

"Scenariji z majhnim zmanjšanjem prenosa po 4. koraku [popolni odpravi omejitev, načrtovani za junij v Angliji] ali s pesimističnimi, vendar verjetnimi predpostavkami o učinkovitosti cepiva, lahko povzročijo ponovno povečanje hospitalizacije, v podobnem obsegu kot januarja 2021."

V dokumentu so zapisali:

»V povečanju hospitalizacij in smrti bodo prevladovali tisti, ki so prejeli dva odmerka cepiva in ki predstavljajo okoli 60 % oziroma 70 % tretjega vala. T

o je mogoče pripisati visokim stopnjam vnosa virusa v najbolj ogroženih starostnih skupinah, tako da neuspeh imunizacije pomeni veliko bolj resno bolezen kot pri necepljenih.«

* * *

Rezultati osrednjega scenarija modela Warwick, ki prikazuje starost in status cepljenja tistih, ki so sprejeti v bolnišnico (levo) ali umirajo (desno) skozi čas. Zgornje ploskve so absolutna števila, spodnje ploskve so razmerja.

Takoj, ko je bil model javno objavljen, so Fact-checkers poskušali demantirati navedbe in zmanjšati pomen dejstva, da bodo tisti, ki so prejeli 2 odmerka COVID-19 cepiva, prevladovali v tretjem valu bolezni COVID-19 in sicer po napovedih modela v visokem deležu 60-70% vseh hospitaliziranih ali umrlih ljudi.

Tako je Grace Rahman iz Full Fact zapisala:

Modeliranje kaže, da ko pride do tretjega vala, bodo hospitalizacije in smrti večinoma pri tistih, ki so bili cepljeni. To je zato, ker bo do takrat bilo cepljenih toliko ranljivih ljudi, ne pa zato, ker jim cepivo škoduje.

Z drugimi besedami: Cepljenje ranljivih skupin ne preprečuje COVID-19 bolezni in/ali smrti.

Vir: https://greatgameindia.com/third-wave-two-vaccines-deaths/

* * *

Dokument angleškega modela tretjega vala COVID-19 je na naslovu:

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/975909/S1182_SPI-M-O_Summary_of_modelling_of_easing_roadmap_step_2_restrictions.pdf

*

Research and analysis

SPI-M-O: Summary of further modelling of easing restrictions – Roadmap Step 2, 31 March 2021

Statement from the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling, Operational sub-group (SPI-M-O)

Details

Paper from the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling, Operational sub-group (SPI-M-O) summarising further modelling on easing restrictions for England (Roadmap Step 2). It was considered at SAGE 85 on 31 March 2021.

This paper should be read alongside the accompanying modelling papers from SAGE 85:

This updates earlier SPI-M-O statements on modelling on easing restrictions, that was tabled at SAGE 81 on 18 February 2021.

These documents are released as pre-print publications that have provided the government with rapid evidence during an emergency. These documents have not been peer-reviewed and there is no restriction on authors submitting and publishing this evidence in peer-reviewed journals.

Redactions in this document have been made to remove any security markings.

The paper is the assessment of the evidence at the time of writing. As new evidence or data emerges, SAGE updates its advice accordingly.

Published 5 April 2021

Vir: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/spi-m-o-summary-of-further-modelling-of-easing-restrictions-roadmap-step-2-31-march-2021

*

Neslavni propad Imperial College modela pandemije COVID-19, ki je podlaga za lockdown ukrepe po svetu:

https://www.aier.org/article/imperial-college-predicted-catastrophe-in-every-country-on-earth-then-the-models-failed/

*

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-19/global-covid-infections-hit-weekly-record-despite-vaccinations

*

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/03/19/world/covid-vaccine-coronavirus-cases

*

https://goodwordnews.com/chile-sees-covid-increase-despite-vaccination-success/

*

https://www.rtvslo.si/zabava-in-slog/ture-avanture/zakaj-v-najbolj-precepljeni-drzavi-sveta-okuzbe-rastejo/579263

http://www.times.si/svet/v-najbolj-cepljeni-drzavi-porast-okuzb-med-cepljenimi--6b8efe4bdebea27fcda2d3b6ca8547ef4518c72e.html

*

https://swprs.org/vaccines-the-tip-of-the-iceberg/

https://swprs.org/covid-rna-vaccines-deaths/

*

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/

Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease

Affiliations 
  • PMID: 33113270
   
Free PMC article

Abstract

Aims of the study: Patient comprehension is a critical part of meeting medical ethics standards of informed consent in study designs. The aim of the study was to determine if sufficient literature exists to require clinicians to disclose the specific risk that COVID-19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus.

Methods used to conduct the study: Published literature was reviewed to identify preclinical and clinical evidence that COVID-19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus. Clinical trial protocols for COVID-19 vaccines were reviewed to determine if risks were properly disclosed.

Results of the study: COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.

Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications: The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.

Nobel Prize winner: Mass COVID vaccination an ‘unacceptable mistake’ that is ‘creating the variants’

In every country, ‘the curve of vaccination is followed by the curve of deaths,’ the famous virologist said.

May 19, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – French virologist and Nobel Prize winner Luc Montagnier called mass vaccination against the coronavirus during the pandemic “unthinkable” and a historical blunder that is “creating the variants” and leading to deaths from the disease.

“It’s an enormous mistake, isn’t it? A scientific error as well as a medical error. It is an unacceptable mistake,” Montagnier said in an interview translated and published by the RAIR Foundation USA yesterday. “The history books will show that, because it is the vaccination that is creating the variants.”

Many epidemiologists know it and are “silent” about the problem known as “antibody-dependent enhancement,” Montagnier said.

“It is the antibodies produced by the virus that enable an infection to become stronger,” he said in an interview with Pierre Barnérias of Hold-Up Media earlier this month. 

Vaccination leading to variants

While variants of viruses can occur naturally, Montagnier said that vaccination is driving the process. “What does the virus do? Does it die or find another solution?” 

“It is clear that the new variants are created by antibody-mediated selection due to the vaccination.”

Vaccinating during a pandemic is “unthinkable” and is causing deaths, the winner of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Medicine for discovery

‘Deaths follow vaccination’

“The new variants are a production and result from the vaccination. You see it in each country, it’s the same: in every country deaths follow vaccination,” he said.

A video published last week on YouTube uses data from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington to illustrate the spikes in deaths in numerous countries across the globe after the introduction of COVID vaccination, confirming Montagnier’s observation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrIoPIQZmUE

The French interviewer pointed to data from the World Health Organization (WHO) showing that since the vaccines were introduced in January, new infections contamination have “exploded,” along with deaths, “notably among young people.”

“Yes,” agreed Montagnier who is a professor at Shanghai Jiao Tong University. “With thrombosis, etc.”

Thrombosis – or blood clots — have been an unexpected problem linked to the new coronavirus vaccines and the cause of AstraZeneca’s vaccine being pulled in several countries. The head of Canada’s public health agency, Theresa Tam, told a press conference Tuesday that there are now 21 confirmed cases of vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia, or VITT, including among three women who died from the blood-clotting disorder potentially linked to AstraZeneca’s vaccine and another 13 cases are under investigation. 

Breakthrough cases

Montagnier said that he is currently conducting research with those who have become infected with the coronavirus after getting the vaccine. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported in April that it had received 5,800 reports of people who had “breakthrough” COVID after being vaccinated, including 396 people who required hospitalization and 74 patients who died. 

“I will show you that they are creating the variants that are resistant to the vaccine,” Montagnier said.

Coronavirus made in a lab

The famous French virologist created waves in April 2020 when he told a French television station that he believed SARS-CoV2, the new pandemic coronavirus, was man-made in a laboratory. The “presence of elements of HIV and germ of malaria in the genome of coronavirus is highly suspect and the characteristics of the virus could not have arisen naturally,” he said

Though he was ridiculed by French experts for having “a conspiracy vision that does not relate to the real science,” Montagnier published a paper in July 2020 supporting his claims that the novel coronavirus must have originated from human experimentation in a lab – a theory that has recently resurfaced and is currently considered the most likely origin of the virus.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/nobel-prize-winner-mass-covid-vaccination-an-unacceptable-mistake-that-is-creating-the-variants

*

COVID-19 encompasses a wide clinical spectrum, ranging from very mild to severe pulmonary pathology and fatal multi-organ disease with inflammatory, cardiovascular, and blood coagulation dysregulation [22-24]. In this sense, cases of vaccine-related ADE or immunopathology would be clinically-indistinguishable from severe COVID-19 [25]. Furthermore, even in the absence of SARS-CoV-2 virus, Spike glycoprotein alone causes endothelial damage and hypertension in vitro and in vivo in Syrian hamsters by down-regulating angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and impairing mitochondrial function [26]. Although these findings need to be confirmed in humans, the implications of this finding are staggering, as all vaccines authorized for emergency use are based on the delivery or induction of Spike glycoprotein synthesis. In the case of mRNA vaccines and adenovirus-vectorized vaccines, not a single study has examined the duration of Spike production in humans following vaccination. Under the cautionary principle, it is parsimonious to consider vaccine-induced Spike synthesis could cause clinical signs of severe COVID-19, and erroneously be counted as new cases of SARS-CoV-2 infections. If so, the true adverse effects of the current global vaccination strategy may never be recognized unless studies specifically examine this question. There is already non-causal evidence of temporary or sustained increases138 in COVID-19 deaths following vaccination in some countries (Fig. 1) and in light of Spike’s pathogenicity, these deaths must be studied in depth to determine whether they are related to vaccination.

Unanticipated adverse reactions to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines

Another critical issue to consider given the global scale of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is autoimmunity. SARS-CoV-2 has numerous immunogenic proteins, and all but one of its immunogenic epitopes have similarities to human proteins [27]. These may act as a source of antigens, leading to autoimmunity [28]. While it is true that the same effects could be observed during natural infection with SARS-CoV-2, vaccination is intended for most of the world population, while it is estimated that only 10% of the world population has been infected by SARS-CoV-2, according to Dr. Michael Ryan, head of emergencies at the World Health Organization. We have been unable to find evidence that any of the currently authorized vaccines screened and excluded homologous immunogenic epitopes to avoid potential autoimmunity due to pathogenic priming.

Some adverse reactions, including blood-clotting disorders, have already been reported in healthy and young vaccinated people. These cases led to the suspension or cancellation of the use of adenoviral vectorized ChAdOx1-nCov-19 and Janssen vaccinesin some countries. It has now been proposed that vaccination with ChAdOx1-nCov-19 can result in immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) mediated by platelet-activating antibodies against Platelet factor-4, which clinically mimics autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia [29]. Unfortunately, the risk was overlooked when authorizing these vaccines, although adenovirus-induced thrombocytopenia has been known for more than a decade, and has been a consistent event with adenoviral vectors [30]. The risk of VITT would presumably be higher in those already at risk of blood clots, including women who use oral contraceptives [31], making it imperative for clinicians to advise their patients accordingly.

At the population level, there could also be vaccine-related impacts. SARS-CoV-2 is a fast-evolving RNA virus that has so far produced more than 40,000 variants [32,33] some of which affect the antigenic domain of Spike glycoprotein [34,35]. Given the high mutation rates, vaccine-induced synthesis of high levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike antibodies could theoretically lead to suboptimal responses against subsequent infections by other variants in vaccinated individuals [36], a phenomenon known as “original antigenic sin” [37] or antigenic priming [38]. It is unknown to what extent mutations that affect SARS-CoV-2 antigenicity will become fixed during viral evolution [39], but vaccines could plausibly act as selective forces driving variants with higher infectivity or transmissibility. Considering the high similarity between known SARS-CoV-2 variants, this scenario is unlikely [32,34] but if future variants were to differ more in key epitopes, the global vaccination strategy might have helped shape an even more dangerous virus. This risk has recently been brought to the attention of the WHO as an open letter [40].

The risks outlined here are a major obstacle to continuing global SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Evidence on the safety of all SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is needed before exposing more people to the184 risk of these experiments, since releasing a candidate vaccine without time to fully understand the resulting impact on health could lead to an exacerbation of the current global crisis [41]. Risk-stratification of vaccine recipients is essential. According to the UK government, people below 60 years of age have an extremely low risk of dying from COVID-191 187 . However, according to Eudravigillance, most of the serious adverse effects following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination occur in people aged 18-64. Of particular concern is the planned vaccination schedule for children aged 6 years and older in the United States and the UK. Dr. Anthony Fauci recently anticipated that teenagers across the country will be vaccinated in the autumn and younger children in early 2022, and the UK is awaiting trial results to commence vaccination of 11 million children under 18. There is a lack of scientific justification for subjecting healthy children to experimental vaccines, given that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that they have a 99.997% survival rate if infected with SARS-CoV-2. Not only is COVID-19 irrelevant as a threat to this age group, but there is no reliable evidence to support vaccine efficacy or effectiveness in this population or to rule out harmful side effects of these experimental vaccines. In this sense, when physicians advise patients on the elective administration of COVID-19 vaccination, there is a great need to better understand the benefits and risk of administration, particularly in understudied groups.

https://americanconservativemovement.com/2021/05/08/57-leading-scientists-doctors-and-public-policy-experts-call-for-immediate-halt-to-covid-vaccine-programs/

*

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSrc_s2Gqfw&t=9s

https://www.logicno.com/hrana-zdravlje/masovna-covid-vakcinacija-neprihvatljiva-greska-koja-stvara-varijante.html

*

O modelu govori svetovna strokovnjakinja za cepiva, dr.Alexandra Henrion-Caude (od 34.00 min dalje):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNjaRWfwz1Q

*

Andrej Rus FB 27.5. 2021

Kaj nas čaka jeseni?
Vlada obljublja, da bo to zadnji lockdown. Da se bo do jeseni Slovenija že vrnila v staro, normalno življenje.
Lansko leto sem podajal točne napovedi, kaj nas čaka jeseni. Le kako sem takrat lahko to vedel? Enostavno: gledal sem, kaj se dogaja v državah na južni polobli, kjer so z letnimi časi pol leta pred nami.
Tale hip imajo na južni polobli že jesen in zato lahko tam vidimo, kaj bo pri nas čez pol leta.
Izbral sem 5 držav iz južne Amerike, ki imajo najvišjo precepljenost (1. slika). Nato sem pogledal število 'okužb' v teh visoko precepljenih državah (2. slika).
Presenečenje, presenečenje… Število 'okuženih' je ta hip v teh državah rekordno visoko, 2-3x več, kot eno leto nazaj! Tudi število mrtvih je višje kot lani, pa se zima še sploh ni začela!! Še zlasti poglejte krivuljo mrtvih v Urugvaju, ki ima že 50% cepljenjih, krivulja smrtnosti gre trenutno v nebo.
Toliko, da veste, kakšno bo stanje pri nas jeseni in pozimi. Vsi tisti, ki sanjate o luči na koncu tunela, boste čez pol leta presenečeni ugotovili, da je v resnici to luč tovornega vlaka, ki vam v tunelu pelje nasproti…
*
*
*
*
*
Velika Britanija: Od 33.206 primerov Delta (indijske) različice, ki so bili sprejeti v bolnišnico do 11. junija, jih 19.573 ni bilo cepljenih. Od tega jih je umrlo 23 (ali 0,1175%). Toda od 13.633 bolnikov, ki so bili cepljeni z enim ali dvema odmerkoma, jih je umrlo 19 (ali 0,1393%), kar je 18,6% višja stopnja smrtnosti kot pri necepljenih bolnikih. Sedem od 5.393 bolnikov, ki so bili delno cepljeni z enim odmerkom, je umrlo ali 0,1297%.
*

MailOnline headline on 13 June read: “Study shows 29% of the 42 people who have died after catching the new strain had BOTH vaccinations.” In Public Health England’s technical briefing on 25 June, that figure had risen to 43% (50 of 117), with the majority (60%) having received at least one dose.

It could sound worrying that the majority of people dying in England with the now-dominant Delta (B.1.617.2) variant have been vaccinated. Does this mean the vaccines are ineffective? Far from it, it’s what we would expect from an effective but imperfect vaccine, a risk profile that varies hugely by age and the way the vaccines have been rolled out.

Consider the hypothetical world where absolutely everyone had received a less than perfect vaccine. Although the death rate would be low, everyone who died would have been fully vaccinated.

The vaccines are not perfect. PHE estimates two-dose effectiveness against hospital admission with the Delta infections at around 94%. We can perhaps assume there is at least 95% protection against Covid-19 death, which means the lethal risk is reduced to less than a twentieth of its usual value.

But the risk of dying from Covid-19 is extraordinarily dependent on age: it halves for each six to seven year age gap. This means that someone aged 80 who is fully vaccinated essentially takes on the risk of an unvaccinated person of around 50 – much lower, but still not nothing, and so we can expect some deaths.

The PHE report also reveals that nearly a third of deaths from the Delta variant are of unvaccinated people over 50, which may be surprising given high vaccine coverage; for example, OpenSAFELY estimates more than 93% among the 65-69s. But there are lower rates in deprived areas and for some ethnicities and communities with limited coverage will continue to experience more than their fair share of loss.

Coverage and effectiveness are important numbers for assessing vaccination programmes. It is better to look at cool analysis by analysts, rather than hot takes on social and other media.

  • David Spiegelhalter is chair of the Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication at Cambridge. Anthony Masters is statistical ambassador for the Royal Statistical Society

*
*
*
*

Death rate from variant COVID virus six times higher for vaccinated than unvaccinated, UK health data show

Hospitalizations are also higher among thousands of fully vaccinated individuals who test positive for the Delta COVID ‘variant of concern.’
LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here. 
LONDON, England, June 18, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – The death rate from the Delta COVID variant is six times higher among those who were fully vaccinated for two weeks or longer than among those who never received a shot, according to data published by Public Health England on Friday. 
Twenty-six people died among 4,087 who were fully vaccinated 14 days or more before testing positive for the Delta COVID variant. This equates to a death rate of 0.00636 percent, which is 6.6 times higher than the rate of 0.000957 deaths – or 34 deaths among 35,521 positive Delta cases among the unvaccinated, according to data published in a June 18 report titled “SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation in England, Technical briefing 16.” 
Both death rates among the unvaccinated and vaccinated are exceedingly low (less than one percent of all positive tests) for a variant that Public Health England describes as the “dominant variant” in the UK, comprising “91 percent of sequenced cases.” 
risk assessment of the Delta variant of the pandemic coronavirus published Friday describes it as being more readily spread between people, but it is also described as a variant with “low infection severity.”   
Mainstream media have latched onto the possibility that the Delta variant is producing higher hospitalization rates in parts of Scotland and England than the “first wave” of the Alpha variant, but according to the UK public health report, these data are based on “early evidence” and “limited understanding of the clinical course of the disease.” 

Higher hospitalization among vaccinated 

Since hospitalizations are of concern, fully vaccinated people are being hospitalized in the UK at a higher rate than unvaccinated people. According to most recent technical briefing report, public health data show that 2.0 percent of vaccinated individuals (84 of 4,087) who tested positive for the Delta variant were admitted to hospital (including those tested upon entering the hospital for any other reason) compared with 1.48 percent of unvaccinated individuals (527 of 35,521). 
The current data is in keeping with data published last week by England’s public health agency that also showed a six-times greater death rate among the fully vaccinated than the unvaccinated and a hospital admission rate of 2.3 percent among those fully vaccinated at least two weeks earlier compared with just 1.2 percent among the unvaccinated. 

Antibody-dependent enhancement? 

This is reminiscent of the ADE (antibody dependent enhancement) phenomenon that has been seen for other vaccine and that has been expressed as a point of concern among many scientists for the COVID vaccines,” Stephanie Seneff, a senior researcher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory told LifeSiteNews. 
ADE blighted previous attempts at coronavirus vaccines and frequently resulted in enhanced lung disease among vaccinated lab animals. It led researchers in 2012 to advise scientists to proceed with “caution” for any human coronavirus vaccines which could lead to enhanced lung disease. 
Seneff said research has shown that coronavirus vaccines alter the ways immune systems respond to infection and can activate other sleeping infections in the vaccinated person such as herpes virus, creating symptoms of Bell’s palsy or shingles.  
“It is conceivable to me that the laser-beam specificity of the induced antibodies is offset by a general weakening of innate immunity,” Seneff said.  
“I also suspect that massive vaccination campaigns may accelerate the rate at which the vaccine-resistant mutant strains become dominant among all the SARS-Co-V2 [coronavirus] strains.” 
*
Hrvaški RTL je objavil prispevek v katerem zdravnica iz bolnice Dubrava pove, da je na njihovem korona oddelku umrlo 8 2 x cepljenih in obolelih za korono.... potem pa HR NIJZ jeclja, kako da nima teh podatkov oziroma kako da so bile kot prvi vzrok smrti navedene druge bolezni in šele potem korona .... zelo zanimiv prispevek
*
*

This is where the infamous “third wave” of the plandemic will come from once the injections have had time to run their course in the injected. Mass death will occur once the full scope of this depopulation agenda is realized.

Though Novella would certainly disagree with this assessment – the guys at sciencebasedmedicine.org have never met a vaccine they did not fully approve of, it turns out – his work and the study he cites directly correlates with the work of Nobel Prize winner Luc Montagnier and others who are warning the public that getting injected is a certifiable death sentence, even if it takes months or years to manifest.

https://dreddymd.com/2021/05/28/vaccine-spike-proteins-are-spreading-more-disease/?fbclid=IwAR2QA9sWWC8AikJxR78RT45pAdL4ZfbqNEHwY9K5llNx0NnnxubehZYHPIM

*

dr. Collough: https://jermwarfare.com/blog/peter-mccullough?fbclid=IwAR2FBhsa7hMNEp9S_fwFQl7giQ9PNevrD_Ht3a1tXi3GOa_pYLSdwvg_FeU

*

https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab554/6303032

Post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infections and incidence of presumptive B.1.427/B.1.429 variant among healthcare personnel at a northern California academic medical center

*

Natural infection vs vaccination: Which gives more protection?

Nearly 40% of new COVID patients were vaccinated - compared to just 1% who had been infected previously.

Coronavirus patients who recovered from the virus were far less likely to become infected during the latest wave of the pandemic than people who were vaccinated against COVID, according to numbers presented to the Israeli Health Ministry.

Health Ministry data on the wave of COVID outbreaks which began this May show that Israelis with immunity from natural infection were far less likely to become infected again in comparison to Israelis who only had immunity via vaccination.

More than 7,700 new cases of the virus have been detected during the most recent wave starting in May, but just 72 of the confirmed cases were reported in people who were known to have been infected previously – that is, less than 1% of the new cases.

With a total of 835,792 Israelis known to have recovered from the virus, the 72 instances of reinfection amount to 0.0086% of people who were already infected with COVID.

By contrast, Israelis who were vaccinated were 6.72 times more likely to get infected after the shot than after natural infection, with over 3,000 of the 5,193,499, or 0.0578%, of Israelis who were vaccinated getting infected in the latest wave.

According to a report by Channel 13, the disparity has confounded – and divided – Health Ministry experts, with some saying the data proves the higher level of immunity provided by natural infection versus vaccination, while others remained unconvinced.

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/309762

*

https://inews.co.uk/news/uk/hms-queen-elizabeth-covid-outbreak-royal-navy-aircraft-carrier-crew-two-vaccines-1103555?fbclid=IwAR1FpC6X1vQixeeTS0tXLl5LMFO5ufhSw9qEhlz1lKmSyiehHzLiAab6Lak

Na britanski letalonosilki so zboleli dvakrat cepljeni 

*

Over 80% of acute COVID-19 cases in Israel are in fully vaccinated patients data from the Israeli Health Authorities. Abundantly clear now the vaccines have failed, particularly Pfizer which was used in Israel.

*

Ciper: največje število okuženih v primerjavi z ostalimi državami medtem večina prebivalstva cepljena.

60% ljudi koji su trenutno u bolnici sa „covidom“ duplo je vakcinisano i to zato što vakcina odjednom nije efikasna - Velika brutanija 20.7. 2021- poročilo iz Downing street

https://www.facebook.com/100069564122218/videos/521743535830591

*

New South Wales Avstralija: 141 ljudi je v bolnišnicah zaradi COVID-19, 45 jih je na intenzivni negi, vsi razen enega so cepljeni !!!
*
https://www.jutarnji.hr/vijesti/svijet/na-islandu-cijepljeno-90-stanovnistva-ali-sada-uvode-citav-niz-restrikcija-jer-im-se-siri-zaraza-15090421

Na Islandu su slučajevi donedavno bili u opadanju, a sada broj raste.

U posljednjih nekoliko dana bilježi se nekoliko desetaka novih slučajeva zaraženih dnevno, što je značajna brojka za otok na kojem živi samo 360.000 stanovnika. Okoli 90% prebivalcev nad 16 let je prejelo vsaj en odmerek cepiva. 

*

Izrael: večina prebivalstva je cepljena, a imajo 1400 novih primerov na dan, delta varinata: je pa manj hospitalizacij in ni povečanja smrtnosti za zdaj. Preučujejo možnost tretjega odmerka cepiva.

https://www.facebook.com/DNEVNIK.hr/videos/1022006148618408/

*

Dr. Mercola: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/07/27/covid-vaccine-failure.aspx?ui=ed4e0d6f2099effe288564c9e36b085b8d16a8cf31a91d8440bab3019033b936&sd=20150611&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1HL&cid=20210727&mid=DM947292&rid=1219223337&fbclid=IwAR1wjoJ-iEZm63Xn-2iXFChgK12js1ABUlCvUiEALRzMA-N4AkZ2HWPSrSk

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • In the U.K., symptomatic COVID-19 cases among “vaccinated” individuals have risen 40% in one week, reaching an average rate of 15,537 new infections a day being detected. Meanwhile, symptomatic COVID-19 cases among the unvaccinated has declined by 22% and is now at a current daily average of 17,588
  • This suggests the wave among unvaccinated has peaked and that natural herd immunity has set in, while “vaccinated” individuals are actually becoming more prone to infection
  • Data show countries with the highest COVID injection rates are also experiencing the greatest upsurges in cases, while countries with the lowest injection rates have the lowest caseloads
  • 100 fully injected crew members had tested positive onboard the British Defense aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth. The Navy ship has a case rate of 1 in 16 — the highest case rate recorded. This suggests vaccine-induced herd immunity is impossible, as these injections apparently cannot prevent COVID-19 even if 100% of a given population gets them
  • It is mathematically impossible for COVID shots to eliminate SARS-CoV-2 infection. The four available COVID shots in the U.S. provide an absolute risk reduction between just 0.7% and 1.3%. Meanwhile, the noninstitutionalized infection fatality ratio across age groups is a mere 0.26%. Since the absolute risk that needs to be overcome is lower than the absolute risk reduction these injections can provide, mass vaccination simply cannot have a favorable impact

In recent weeks, a number of signs have emerged indicating the COVID-19 injections cannot put an end to COVID-19 outbreaks. In the July 15, 2021, video report above, Dr. John Campbell reviews data coming out of the U.K. On a side note, I do not agree with everything Campbell says in this video, such as promoting mask wearing, for example. It’s his data review that is of interest here.

As noted in the video, as of July 15, 87.5% of the adult population in the U.K. had received one dose of COVID-19 “vaccine” and 67.1% had received two. Yet symptomatic cases among partially and fully “vaccinated” are now suddenly on the rise, with an average of 15,537 new infections a day being detected, a 40% increase from the week before.

Meanwhile, the daily average of new symptomatic cases among unvaccinated is 17,588, down 22% from the week before. This suggests the wave among unvaccinated has peaked and that natural herd immunity has set in, while “vaccinated” individuals are becoming more prone to infection.

"V Združenem kraljestvu so se COVID-19 simptomi med cepljenimi posamezniki v enem tednu povečali za 40% in dosegli povprečno stopnjo odkritih 15.537 novih okužb na dan. Medtem pa so se COVID-19 simptomi med necepljenimi zmanjšali za 22% in znaša trenutno dnevno povprečje 17.588. To kaže, da je val med necepljenimi dosegel vrhunec in da se je pojavila naravna čredna imunost, medtem ko so "cepljeni" posamezniki pravzaprav vse bolj nagnjeni k okužbi. Podatki kažejo, da države z najvišjo stopnjo COVID-19 cepljenja doživljajo tudi največje povečanje števila primerov, medtem ko imajo države z najnižjimi stopnjami cepljenja najnižje število primerov.
100 polno cepljenih članov posadke na krovu britanske obrambne letanosilke HMS Queen Elizabeth, je bilo pozitivnih. Ladja mornarice ima število primerov 1 v 16 - največja zabeležena stopnja primerov. To kaže, da je čredna imunost s cepivi nemogoča, saj cepiva očitno ne morejo preprečiti COVID-19, tudi če jih dobi 100% prebivalstva.
Matematično je nemogoče, da COVID-19 cepiva odstranijo okužbo s SARS-CoV-2. Štiri razpoložljiva COVID-19 cepiva v ZDA zagotavljajo absolutno zmanjšanje tveganja med samo 0,7% in 1,3%. Medtem je stopnja smrtnosti med neinstitucionaliziranimi okužbami v vseh starostnih skupinah ZGOLJ 0,26%. Ker je absolutno tveganje, ki ga je treba premagati, nižje od absolutnega zmanjšanja tveganja, ki ga lahko nudijo cepiva, množično cepljenje preprosto ne more nuditi ugodnega vpliva."
Celotni članek bi v normalnih razmerah zadostoval za končanje kakršnih koli psihoz razglašenih kriz. Razumeli bi ga normalni novinarji in uredniki. In razumeli bi ga normalni politiki in odločevalci. Na žalost beseda normalno ni več pogosta v navedenih skupinah.
*
*
*
*
Ameriški center za nadzor bolezni (CDC) je pravkar objavil znanstveni dokument, ki potrjuje celotno prevaro.
Imenuje se "Izbruh okužb z virusom SARS-CoV-2, vključno s prelomnimi okužbami s cepivom COVID-19, povezan z velikimi javnimi zbiranji - okrožje Barnstable, Massachusetts, julij 2021" in šokantno priznava, da je bilo 74 % okužb pri popolnoma cepljenih osebah (dvojni odmerek):
Julija 2021 je bilo med prebivalci Massachusettsa ugotovljenih 469 primerov COVID-19, povezanih s številnimi poletnimi dogodki in velikimi javnimi zbiranji v mestu v okrožju Barnstable v Massachusettsu; precepljenost upravičenih prebivalcev Massachusettsa je bila 69 %. Približno tri četrtine (346; 74 %) primerov se je pojavilo pri popolnoma cepljenih osebah (tistih, ki so prejele 2 odmerka cepiva mRNA [Pfizer-BioNTech ali Moderna] ali prejele en odmerek cepiva Janssen [Johnson & Johnson] ?14 dni pred izpostavljenostjo).
Glejte, C-19 cepivo je pandemija. S cepivom se širi proteinska konica, lažni testi PCR pa so gorivo za vzdrževanje množične histerije.
Genomsko sekvenciranje
Pri vzorcih 133 bolnikov je bila ugotovljena B.1.617.2 (Delta)
različica virusa SARS-CoV-2, ki povzroča COVID-19, v
119 (89 %) in podrazličica Delta AY.3 pri enem (1 %). Na splošno,
274 (79 %) cepljenih bolnikov s prebolelo okužbo
je bilo simptomatskih. Med petimi bolniki s COVID-19, ki so
so bili hospitalizirani, so bili štirje v celoti cepljeni; smrtnih primerov ni bilo.
*
Nenad Bakič FB 2.8. 2021: Budući da pratim 199,5 zemalja, danas sam odlučio malo pogledati ove na 'I'. Usporedio sam 3 velika uspjeha (čvrsti lockdown i veliki obuhvat cijepljenja) s 'neuspješnom' Indijom, i Hrvatskom. Ovi uspješni trenutno imaju oko 10 puta veću epidemiju nego mi  (Vidite zašto oštromjeraši ne vole 'grafikone')
*

0:02:54.1 Dr. McCullough: No, it looks like it doesn’t. We have a really breaking reports from Israel, where about 80% of the adult population over age 20 has received the Pfizer vaccine, and in fact, about 80% of those covid 19 cases, in fact are among the vaccinated individuals. Among those hospitalized in Israel it’s 60% have been fully vaccinated. The same thing is true in the United Kingdom, where they have about 75% vaccinated. In this case with an array of vaccines, Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca, Oh, 40% of those hospitalized in the UK, in fact have been fully vaccinated. What’s going on is the delta variant, and this is one in a sequence of variance that really has arisen as a result of mass vaccination, now the Delta brand has undergone antigenic escape immune escape, if you will, and it’s avoiding the antibodies of the vaccine and causing covid 19 illness in individuals. Fortunately, it’s mild and it’s more easily treated. But the great fear is that the vaccinated will assume they are protected, when in fact, they’re not.

0:04:00.1 Del Bigtree: So you are one of these scientists, and there is a debate about this over this idea that Dr. Gert vanden Bossche really brought to the world, which is this pressure of a vaccine in the middle of a pandemic, giving a vaccine where the antibodies have… Are not robust enough, they haven’t mounted… You don’t have enough of the population that that vaccine has the potential to pressure the virus to escape, to immune escape, to develop qualities that get around the immune system, certainly get around whatever the antibodies are designed by the vaccination. Do you believe that is what we are seeing when they talk about the Delta variant? Because we hear mainstream news here in America saying It’s the unvaccinated that are causing variants like the Delta…

0:04:53.6 Dr. McCullough: Well, that was a paper published last fall by an author, van door that analyzed this and basically let us know there’s probably at least 125 different variants out there. We know that there’s over 1000 potential mutations, but the variants are largely restricted to changes, amino acid changes in the spike protein, and that’s where all the antigenic action is with respect to the vaccines, and then a critical analysis by Nisan and colleagues from the Mayo Clinic in Boston have shown when a population gets to be more than 25% vaccinated, that’s enough of an evolutionary pressure to allow one of these mutant forms to become the dominant strain. So vaccination is reducing the viral diversity and making a more compressed environment with fewer number of mutant strains and allows one to become more dominant.

0:05:40.8 Dr. McCullough: In the case of India, it was the use of the Sinovac vaccine that really prompted the emergence of the Delta variant, and now we’re seeing Sinovac again being the stimulus for the emergence of the Lambda variant out of Peru. So mass vaccination as opposed to targeted vaccination is in a sense, creating the problem of this immune escape of the virus…

0:06:01.6 Del Bigtree: Now, when a lay person, even myself, when I hear vaccine pressure, I get this idea that the vaccine hits a virus and that little virus sitting there like working out saying “I’m gonna beat you” and figures out a way around. But is it that or is it really more of the fact that so many people that take a vaccine have immunity to one strain or one variant, that the other variants always there, it just becomes more prominent because it’s not being stopped by anything, so… Is that a better description of what’s taking place?

0:06:36.0 Dr. McCullough: Yeah, I think it is. I’m an internist and cardiologist, and I’m also trained in epidemiology, and I think as a Professor of Medicine, I’ve basically done an entire year of dedicated covid research and work at this point in time, studying this very carefully, and that’s my understanding – as you articulated – that there is this array of strains out there, and then as each one… – patients can actually be infected with more than one stream at a time, but in a population… Our CDC keeps track of this, the original wild type strain, that the vaccines are coded to by the way, that’s extinct now, now we’re down to six strains, the emerging strain that’s dominant in the United States is the delta variant, which appears to be able to escape all the known vaccines right now, and then second now is the UK variant, which previously was responsive to our vaccines.

0:07:23.9 Del Bigtree: Now, is your opinion, because what I’ve been reading, many studies keep looking at the previously infected, those unvaccinated people that caught the wild virus. We keep seeing amazing numbers for them, studies showing that they’re maintaining their immunity. I think a study out of Israel said that there was only 1% or less than 1% that were being re-infected when nearly 50% of the vaccinated were the ones being in hospitals. Do you believe that the Delta variant is going to be an issue for people that were previously naturally infected by the coronavirus?

0:08:00.3 Dr. McCullough: Now, the Natural Immunity appears to be robust, complete and durable. And when there’s a really solid case of someone documented with infection, they have the characteristic signs of symptoms and they have a positive PCR and antigen test, that person has lifetime what we believe is lifetime durable immunity. There’s never been a second documented case in an individual where the first episode was substantiated. However, the confusion occurs when someone has not had a solid first case, but maybe has had antibody test turn positive and there there is a remote possibility of an infection, so they may have the ambient positive Antibodies to start with. An analysis by Merciu and colleagues, 650000 individuals across the 11 studies, looked at this idea of having a prior infection and not well-defined, and the answer was a 02% chance of infection. Unlike the vaccine where we know even in the spring in the United States, our CDC had a fully documented 10000 cases of vaccine failures by the end of May, so.

0:09:06.3 Dr. McCullough: We know the vaccines were even failing before the Delta variant moved in and the effect… The CDC gave up on this, and they started doing what’s called “asymmetric reporting”, meaning that they were not gonna count vaccine failures in the covid 19 rates, and that’s how their talking points were generated. Americans should know that the CDC by the end of May had announced symmetric reporting of covid 19. This is important to understand! That they were only gonna report covid 19 community cases in those that were unvaccinated, that they were no longer gonna track covid 19 in those who had received vaccination. And if they became aware, if the first test was obtained in the hospital and they were vaccinated, they were trying to link it up with vaccine databases, but otherwise the CDC is intentionally and willfully blind to breakthrough cases for covid 19 vaccination. So that’s what’s created the false and fraudulent talking point that 99% of American cases were unvaccinated. It’s not true, it’s probably roughly 50-50, and that’s what we’re seeing in practice. We have about half the cases are indeed vaccine failures.

0:10:15.9 Del Bigtree: That’s what I’m hearing from my friends in ER and obviously what we’re seeing in other nations around the world, especially Israel, where that’s probably the best test group to be looking at as a nation. So when I see doctors and scientists reporting on the news that the immunity given by the vaccine is better than the natural immunity, can I call that a lie? Is that officially a lie, when we hear that?

0:10:44.3 Dr. McCullough: It’s a false statement and it may be intended to somehow promote the vaccine. But the natural immunity is robust, complete and durable, as you know, it has a full biologic support where we can’t get the infection again and the vaccine is frankly failing. So the vaccine must be a far inferior to natural immunity.

0:11:03.7 Del Bigtree: So now let me ask you this, there’s a lot of people that are skeptical about that right into our show. And they’re saying, Do we really have antibody tests that are capable of delineating the Delta variant? Is this delta variant mythological in that they’re just claiming every infection now is Delta variant when we hear that it’s the dominant strain? What conscience is behind that? Can we trust that science that this is all Delta Variant? As you said, the original wild strain is now… Eradicated, is gone, it’s disappeared. How are they coming to the conclusion it’s the Delta variant and not the Lambda? Are these PCR-tests, which is most of what’s being used, are they accurate enough to determine what variant people are infected with?

0:11:49.4 Dr. McCullough: The variants are determined by genomic sequencing tests. So sequencing test is very different than PCR or antigen tests. They have to rely on sequences in the spike protein and the nucleoid capsule. The United Kingdom is doing a great job. They publish a variant of interest report, the last one was the 17th version on June 25th, where they had fully sequenced about a quarter million infections. And there we knew 90 million… I’m sorry, 250000 infections, and they had 900000 infections that were in fact the Delta variant there. They knew that 42% were fully vaccinated. So they’ve done a wonderful job in sequencing. The CDC does a select sample of sequencing as well, and that’s how we know. The report the last one we had, the CDC was the end of June, we’re down to about 6 variants. The alpha variant was still slightly dominant, I think at about 30%, and Delta was right behind it. We now have reports that Delta has emerged as the dominant strain in the United States.

0:12:49.3 Del Bigtree: But as you’ve said, it appears that it may be more infectious, but not more deadly or dangerous. Is that the correct statement?

0:13:01.5 Dr. McCullough: The Infectivity is determined from in vitro tests using a human cell culture to see if the virus can more effectively invade a human cell, it doesn’t apply to populations now where there are so many individuals who have natural immunity. So I don’t think from an epidemiologic perspective, this is more infectious at all, it’s not going very fast. In Israel, at the peak of their cases, they had 10000 cases a day, they have a thousand cases per day now, it’s mainly Delta. And I’ve told America I’ve been on national TV several times, we’re gonna get a small rise in Delta, but it’s not gonna be anything like what we saw in December. So it doesn’t have… The herd immunity is gonna buffer that Infectivity. It does have a lower mortality rate, that we’re seeing out of the UK. The UK before had a mortality rate of the alpha strain at 1.8% and the Delta at a case fatality rate of 0.2% of the cases that came to attention. But mortality is so highly amenable to early treatment, it’s really hard to report on that. In Delta cases who get early treatment with multi-drug approach, the mortality should be negligible.

0:14:08.5 Del Bigtree: Do you share the concern that was put out by Dr. Geert vanden-Bossche and others, that if we keep pressuring this virus, we’re gonna create an unnatural evolution where the virus tends to want to evolve to become less deadly, it’ll kill its host, I’ll wipe itself out, but under a largely vaccinated community, a virus can live. It can start to have immune escape and we could end up creating a virus that is more deadly. That is maybe vaccine-resistant and more deadly. Do you share any of Dr. Vanden-Bossche’s concerns, or do you think what we’re watching is natural, and this is all gonna sort of just work itself out?

0:14:52.5 Dr. McCullough: Now, the analysis that I mentioned from Nisan and colleagues does suggest the vaccines… Vaccination is influencing the natural ecological biology of the virus. So we’re getting fewer strains, strains that are becoming more dominant as they try to escape the immunity of the vaccine, but so far they’re progressively less virulent, and we haven’t seen this disaster scenario that was passed by some immunologist to suggest we may breed just a monster virus that’s gonna wipe us out. But we are getting signals since the current sets of vaccines don’t work anymore, and we’re starting in a sense to play with mother nature and the overall compression of the diversity of viruses, we’re getting some signals here that we probably should shut down the vaccine program and go ahead and close out the pandemic with early treatment.

0:15:50.0 Del Bigtree: Obviously, you’ve done a lot of discussions about treatment. When I was talking to an ER Doctor, my friend just earlier today, we were talking about that, that we’re seeing this surge, or he’s saying it feels like there’s a surge and it’s in both vaccinated and unvaccinated. Is there a surge? There’s a lot of discussion right now. I’ve heard numbers as high as 70%, higher hospitalization rates in some states across America than we were at last week. As though we could end up in a situation, California just said, everybody put your masks back on, vaccinated or unvaccinated, everybody’s putting their masks back on. There’s a concern, I think amongst those people that finally are feeling free, are out breathing the air. A summer was robbed from us last year, we’re enjoying this one. There’s a concern, we’re gonna go back into these measures of lockdowns and masks because the news really seems big on this surge is happening. Is there a surge? How concerned should we be about it?

0:16:58.2 Dr. McCullough: Well, we have a very low baseline, so any increase from a low baseline will look like a percentage, like a big number in percentage. We are having arise, this was anticipated. It’s happening in the UK, it’s happening in many places around the world. Is happening in Japan right now, but it’s not at the level of a surge where we need to become bad already. In my view, there’s no public health impetus to start wearing masks or going into lockdown. We do need to make… The monoclonal antibody is available, we need to have a lot of messaging on that. We need to have a lot of message on early treatment, protect the high risk seniors, especially because the vaccines are failing. And all these people have gotten the vaccine instead of being protected, now, they’re actually susceptible to the Delta variant.

0:17:44.6 Del Bigtree: When I was talking to my friend, I said, “How bad is the surge?” He says it’s just like a regular flu, it’s not anything more. I said, Yeah, but we’re in the middle of the summer in July. Is it like flu in July? And he said, No, that’s a good point. That is weird, that we are seeing a surge of respiratory virus in the middle of the summer… How would you explain that? That is something I don’t remember in my lifetime, any form of a flue or Coronavirus having any sort of action, especially a surge in the middle of the summer. Have we unnaturally created that? Or what would be the explanation?

0:18:20.2 Dr. McCullough: I Think the most ready explanation – and Geert vanden Bossche did predict this, and that’s carriage. Now, it’s possible that mass vaccination has now allowed those who have been vaccinated to carry the virus and then transmit it to others and hit a susceptible person who can express symptoms. If that’s the case, we may actually have a lot more Delta around and the vaccinated are simply carrying it to one another. You heard about a bunch of law makers who got on an airplane and they were ostensibly well, and when they got off the plane, a couple of people developed covid 19 afterwards. There was a naval shipping vessel that had 3700 sailors on, all vaccinated, ostensibly all fine… And then 100 cases developed over the next few weeks. It brings up the issue of carriage. And this is a little bit disturbing, ’cause if that’s the case, now we’re just gonna carry this virus into summer season and everything else, as opposed to going through some natural oscillation. So I’m a bit concerned about these events that have been reported in the last few weeks.

0:19:24.2 Del Bigtree: We were sold on “the vaccination is our only way forward”. You’ve been an outspoken person on the idea that it was never just vaccinations, that there have been treatments: Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, Budesonide these are all products that have been through some pretty extensive studies now, showing that they have varying degrees of effectiveness, certainly more effective than what we’re seeing from the vaccination. What is our way forward? And are you, in your speaking out the way you have, are you seeing the hospital systems in America listening and starting to use more of these treatments, or is there still this very strange resistance by hospital groups to actually treat the people with things that seem to be working around the world?

0:20:11.3 Dr. McCullough: I think there’s more and more American doctors certainly are joining the circles of early treatment, particularly primary care doctors, independent doctors. There are now national and regional telemedicine services treating doctors. The word is out, America knows that this is a treatable illness, and they’re seeking treatments through a variety of sources, more and more doctors are coming online. The hospital doctors are much slower and they’re still stuck trying to give Remdesivir and other things that really don’t work in the hospital, and they’re too late. So we need more to jump on board with early treatment, it’s supported by the “Association of American Physicians and Surgeons”, another leading group called the “Frontline Critical Care [Alliance]”. These are really leading groups now for early treatment, and the drugs have been flowing in the United States now for a month. Basically millions of Americans and avoided hospitalization and death with the use of early treatment. No single drug works alone, but they certainly work well in combinations.

0:21:07.5 Del Bigtree: When we look at these numbers that are touted in the news, over 600000 killed by SARS COV 2, which makes it arguably one of the most deadly pathogens ever to sweep America. Do you trust those number? How do you as a physician, someone that has, I believe, always been pro vaccine, you’re a part of working in the system, you believe in medicine. Do you believe those numbers? Are we really seeing the death of over 600000 people from this virus?

0:21:42.3 Dr. McCullough: The CDC acknowledges itself on its web pages that 90% of individuals have significant contributing illnesses to the death. About 10% looks like it’s Covid 19 alone. In pediatrics, I think, we’re almost down… Dr. Macri from Hopkins has an analysis that was presented this week suggesting maybe we’re down to one child in the United States died of Covid-19 itself, all the other children had contributing diseases like leukemia, cystic fibrosis, etc. I’ve never seen a viral illness like this, I’ve treated far more than 100 patients, I’ve advised on many hundreds if not thousands of individuals. There’s viral replication, cytokine storm and thrombosis. It appears to be a really difficult illness to treat late, and it seems so easy to treat early.

0:22:31.8 So my best advice is age over 50, multiple medical problems: Treat early and we can avoid death, whatever it’s cause attribution.

0:22:38.0 Del Bigtree: The President of the United States. Jen Psaki, [they] have made statements this week, pretty strong statements, that people that speak against the effectiveness, like we’re doing of this vaccine right now, speak against the safety, to say anything that is not safe and effective that they’re essentially… We’re killing people. I think Biden may have backed it off at one point, he said Facebook allowing this information to be shared are murderers. That is very, very strong language from the president of a free country, this administration, not to get political about it, but this is the nation we live in… And we are seeing at the same time, this rhetoric is coming out discussions of door-to-door censors based on your vaccination status, it’s clear when we look at the door knickers, they’re gonna be taking information… Have you been back in NATO? Have you not… Dr. Tony Fauci has said he supports mandates in businesses and universities pushing this vaccine, which you and I now clearly are discussing is not doing the job. So why would we push it…

0:23:46.2 Del Bigtree: You wanna wind it down, they seem to wanna go further. How do you see this coming to a head between really two different medical or science perspectives and the most powerful position in the world and the President of the United States…

0:24:02.7 Dr. McCullough: Well, here we are, Dell, We are right at 50% of Americans don’t want the vaccine, 50% of Americans have not been fully vaccinated, the vaccine centers have started decline mid-April, they’ve been empty in May and June, and now into July, there are inducements, and bribes, and lotteries, and mandates. It’s pretty clear, Americans don’t want the vaccine. The word is out, they understand it’s not working. They see their relatives getting sick after vaccination, they’re seeing record numbers of vaccine related fatalities and injuries, and so this is gonna be just an unbelievably tense struggle between, well, of the people and those who really wanna force the vaccine on the population, on the remainder of the population, when the vaccine is not effective and it’s not safe.

0:24:56.2 Del Bigtree: What… Just to wrap it up, because I get asked this all the time, What am I supposed to do as a citizen? So many people call in: “my employer is forcing it”. We just don’t know what we do in this situation, and we wanna believe in our country, but we can tell that our leadership is – You’ve just pointed out. It’s clear to anyone looking at it – is wrong on a very, very important topic. Some of us feel disempowered at this time. What is your recommendation to people, someone’s gonna come up to the door and knock, ask them their status, they’re gonna be moving into a space that doesn’t look like the United States of America, as we know it. Lists are being made. What do you want… What do you think is the message we need to put out to American citizens, especially on how we move forward and get through this very… As you said it, I think it’s gonna be a very complicated time?

0:25:50.3 Dr. McCullough: I think Americans are gonna really need to make their voice known through the phone and through messaging of their leaders. So many Americans I talk to, I get these desperate emails and messages too, Del, and they say: “Dr. McCullough, can you help me with a mandate or what have you?”… And I said, Well, Have you messaged your company? Or have you messaged how you feel to your university? And the answer is “No, I haven’t, I’m afraid” ____ that personal fear, the fear of reprisal and actually make their voices known to the people we are talking about… They haven’t gotten enough resistance, they haven’t gotten enough negative feedback, they actually think they’re doing the right thing by mass vaccinating the population. And they need to hear the voices of Americans, about half of us, basically say, Listen, we need to stop…

0:26:31.1 Del Bigtree: I agree with you. It’s time for people to speak their truth. To stand in their truth, be bold in their truth and make it difficult… Right, I’m not talking about doing anyone any harm, but stand! It’s time to resist things that are not American, and rights that are truly ours, given to us by God. If we don’t stand for it, stand up for it, nobody will. Dr. McCulloughll, I know you’re racing off, you’re a very busy man, and we really appreciate your knowledge and you’re taking the time. And most especially, I wanna thank you for really putting it on the line, so many doctors and scientists been afraid to speak out. Many of them speak to me privately, the more of you that step forward and speak the way you have in media, I think you’re really making a difference, and your changing the world. It’s an honor to know you. I hope you go down in history and it shines brightly upon you as we make our way through this…

0:27:25.6 Dr. McCullough: Thank you. Del, same to you!

https://childrenshealthdefense.eu/aiovg_videos/dr-peter-mccullough-discuss-the-serious-problem-with-the-efficacy-of-the-covid19-vaccines-and-how-mass-vaccination-is-creating-this-runaway-train-of-a-pandemic/?fbclid=IwAR3hN4BL0v-ujFymmWm7qhqdhfxLLLTrrlos8BJdFtjPe8AANth7H_u1OcQ

*

Coronavirus Spreading Among the Vaccinated in Highly Vaccinated Countries

Analysis by The Vaccine Reaction

A recent study published by King's College in London, which operates the ZOE COVID Study app to monitor COVID infection and vaccination rates, found that, as of July 15, 2021, there was an average of 15,537 new daily symptomatic cases COVID-19 among partly or fully vaccinated people in the United Kingdom—an increase of 40 percent from the previous week's total of 11,084 new cases.1,2

Infections in Vaccinated People in U.K. Are Outpacing Infections in the Unvaccinated

The Zoe COVID Study, led by epidemiologist Tim Spector, MD, of Kings College in London, estimated that there were 17,581 new daily symptomatic cases of COVID-19 in unvaccinated people, or 22 percent less than the previous week's total of 22,638 new cases.

According to a press release issued by the study's authors, "With cases in the vaccinated group continuing to rise, the number of new cases in the vaccinated population is set to overtake the unvaccinated in the coming days."3,4

On July 17, the U.K.'s Health Secretary, Sajid Javid, announced he had tested positive for the SARS-CoV-2 virus despite having received two doses of the AstraZeneca/Oxford University's experimental AZD1222 COVID vaccine on Mar. 17 and May 16.5 In a message posted on Twitter, Javid wrote:

"This morning I tested positive for COVID. I'm waiting for my PCR result, but thankfully I have had my jabs and symptoms are mild."6

With a population of more than 66 million people, two-thirds of adults in the U.K. have received COVID-19 vaccine, representing a total of 82,592,996 vaccinations as of July 20. Some 46,349,709 Britons have received the first dose and 36,243,287 have gotten the second dose. The country is not vaccinating children.7

The U.K. is among the most highly vaccinated countries in the world, but it is experiencing a third wave of coronavirus infections reportedly largely due to the spread of the Delta variant of the virus.8,9 Other highly vaccinated countries like Israel are also experiencing a new wave of coronavirus infections due to the Delta variant.

Most Infections in Israel Are Among Vaccinated People

In Israel, about 60 percent of the country's population of 9.3 million has received at least one dose of a COVID vaccine. About 85 percent of adults in Israel have been vaccinated. Yet most of the new coronavirus infections are occurring in vaccinated people.10

In early-July, former Health Minister Chezy Levy, MD confirmed that "55 percent of the newly infected [people in Israel] had been vaccinated."11

There has also been a concerning rise in the number of vaccinated people in Israel being hospitalized. An article in The Jerusalem Post last week noted that the Israeli Health Ministry reported 124 people had been hospitalized for COVID-19 on July 20 and that 65 percent of them were fully vaccinated. Of the 124 people, 62 were in serious condition and 70% of those patients were fully vaccinated.12

Earlier this month, the Health Ministry estimated that the Pfizer/BioNTech's BNT162b2 COVID biologic was only 64 percent effective in preventing symptomatic infections of COVID-19, specifically those caused by the Delta variant. But the effectiveness rate for Pfizer's experimental COVID vaccine in preventing infection (and transmission) could be lower.13

"We do not know exactly to what degree the vaccine helps, but it is significantly less," said Israel's Prime Minister Naftali Bennett.14

Infections in Chile, Seychelles and Mongolia Mostly in Vaccinated People

Another example of a highly vaccinated country which has been experiencing a new outbreak of coronavirus infections mostly among its vaccinated population is Chile. Of the thousands of new coronavirus cases being reported daily in that country, 80 percent of them are in vaccinated people. Chile has fully vaccinated 55 percent of its population.15

The examples of the U.K., Israel and Chile, as well as other highly vaccinated countries like the Seychelles and Mongolia experiencing coronavirus infections mostly within the vaccinated segments of their populations pose a dilemma.16 The governments of these countries have to decide if the problem is that not enough of their people have been vaccinated, or that the vaccines are simply not as effective as initially assumed they would be.

Could Vaccinations Be Causing Rise in Infections?

There is also a third possible problem which was raised by French virologist and Nobel laureate Luc Montagnier, MD in May 2021. In an interview with Pierre Barnérias of Hold-Up Media, Dr. Montagnier said he believed that the mass vaccination programs for COVID may actually be causing SARS-CoV-2 mutations like the Delta variant and, thus, prolonging the pandemic.17

Dr. Montagnier explained that in each country that undertakes a mass vaccination campaign, "the curve of vaccinations is followed by the curve of deaths." He said that the COVID vaccines create antibodies that force the virus to "find another solution" or "die," adding that it is the variants that "are a production and result from the vaccination."18

Dr. Montagnier's views are admittedly controversial. The thought that vaccinations may actually be exacerbating the COVID pandemic is perhaps too difficult a concept for government officials to consider. But this possibility should not be dismissed outright.

One of the best explanations of this dynamic was given by Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) in a 2011 interview when she described the evolution of pertussis bacteria to evade the vaccines:

"[E]very life form wants to live, wants to survive. Universal principle. And viruses and bacteria are no exception. And when you put a pressure on a virus or bacteria that's circulating, with the use of a vaccine that contains a lab-altered form of that virus or bacteria, it doesn't seem that it would be illogical to understand that that organism is going to fight to survive, it's going to find a way to adapt in order to survive."19

Izrael: v bolnišnicah so cepljeni (85-90%) : https://www.facebook.com/KraljevicMarkoIII/videos/989213351881055

*

 #EKSPLOZIVNO

Nemški glavni #patolog opozarja na smrtne poškodbe c3piva
Direktor Patološkega inštituta Univerze v Heidelbergu Peter Schirmacher je opravil več kot štirideset #obdukcij ljudi, ki so umrli v dveh tednih po #c3pljenju. Schirmacher je izrazil zaskrbljenost nad svojimi ugotovitvami.
Regionalni dnevnik Augsburger Allgemeine je poročal: »Schirmacher predvideva, da jih je 30 do 40 odstotkov umrlo zaradi c3pljenja. Po njegovem mnenju je pogostost usodnih posledic c3pljenj podcenjena-politično eksplozivna izjava v času, ko kampanja c3pljenja izgublja zagon, varianta Delta se hitro širi in se razpravlja o omejitvah za nec3pljene. "
Merklova administracija se je hitro odzvala na to "politično eksplozivno" izjavo iz Heidelberga. Po poročanju nemške tiskovne agencije (dpa) je Inštitut Paul Ehrlich objavil, da so Schirmacherjeve izjave "nerazumljive". Kanclerkin lakaj, višji nemški imunolog Thomas Mertens je takoj zavrnil ugotovitve: "Ne poznam nobenih podatkov, ki bi omogočili utemeljeno izjavo, in ne predvidevam števila, o katerem se ne poroča."
Imunolog Christian Bogdan iz univerzitetne bolnišnice Erlangen, član stalne komisije za c3pljenje (STIKO), je prav tako nasprotoval Schirmacherjevi domnevi o "velikem številu neprijavljenih zapletov pri c3pljenju ali celo smrti".
Patolog je sicer dobil podporo iz svojih vrst, Zvezno združenje nemških patologov pa je navedlo, da je treba opraviti več obdukcij c3pljenih, ki so umrli v določenem časovnem okviru po c3pljenju.
Vodja "delovne skupine za obdukcijo" v tem združenju je želel o tem opozoriti zdravnike splošne medicine in zdravstvene organe. Z drugimi besedami, zdravniki bolnikov, ki umrejo v nekaj dneh ali tednih po c3pljenju, bi #morali v primeru #dvoma zaprositi za #obdukcijo ali pa bi morali zdravstveni organi ukrepati.
Zvezno združenje patologov je to že zahtevalo marca v pismu ministru za zdravje Jensu Spahnu (CDU), vendar je ostalo brez odgovora.
Schirmacherjevo opozorilo bi seveda lahko uničilo večmestno dolgoročno milijardo dolarjev vreden posel za različna farmacevtska podjetja, medtem ko bi se že tako nizka pripravljenost, da bi pik prejeli v preostali necepljeni skupini, še dramatično zmanjšala in na koncu bi se lahko celotna pandemična strategija zvezne vlade zapletla.
Toda #resnost in #ugled direktorja Patološkega inštituta na univerzi v Heidelbergu sta #neomajni.
Schirmacher sam že vodi projekt obdukcije ljudi, umrlih zaradi Covid-19, ki ga subvencionira država. Nato je sam razširil fokus in obduciral tudi več kot 40 umrlih c3pljenih ljudi. Tudi če so njegovi rezultati le posnetek, je dramatičen: 30 do 40 odstotkov jih je umrlo zaradi samega c3pljenja. Patolog je navedel "redke, hude stranske učinke c3pljenja - na primer trombozo možganskih žil ali avtoimunske bolezni".
Schirmacher se je odzval na kritike nekaterih kolegov. Zanikal je pomanjkanje usposobljenosti: "Kolegi se vsekakor motijo, ker tega posebnega vprašanja ne morejo kompetentno oceniti." Poleg tega ni poskušal širiti panike in ni nasprotnik c3pljenj - sam Schirmacher je bil c3pljen.
Inštitut Robert Koch se na svoji spletni strani sklicuje na redna varnostna poročila Inštituta Paul Ehrlich. Če pa bi v prihodnjih tednih postalo očitno, da politika, znanost in mediji vodijo kampanjo proti Schirmacherju in da se njegovi zaskrbljujoči rezultati popolnoma ignorirajo, bi bila to še ena rdeča zastava glede varnosti izdelkov.
Twitter je medtem blokiral račun nekdanjega znanstvenega dopisnika New York Timesa Alexa Berensona, ker je delil podrobnosti kliničnega preskušanja Pfizerja s podobnimi ugotovitvami, ki popolnoma izbrišejo navedbe o političnem establišmentu.
Po navedbah Pfizerja: »V slepem kontroliranem obdobju je umrlo 15 prejemnikov BNT162b2 in 14 prejemnikov placeba; med odprtim obdobjem so umrli 3. prejemniki BNT162b2 in 2 prvotna prejemnika placeba, ki so prejeli BNT162b2, potem ko so odstranili slepoto. Nobena od teh smrti po mnenju preiskovalcev ni povezana z BNT162b2. " Navedlo je, da so vzroki smrti uravnoteženi med skupinami BNT162b2 in placebom: umrlo je 15 ljudi, ki so prejeli c3pivo, in 14 ljudi, ki so jemali placebo.
Toda na stotine ljudi, ki so bili v skupini, ki je prejemala placebo, je sedaj prejelo pik, zato je "poskusna slepota zdaj končana" in "to so vsi podatki, ki jih bomo kdaj imeli", je poudaril Berenson.
PS: prevod je neformalen.
Povezava na nemško izvorno objavo: https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Corona-Chef-Pathologe-der-Uni-Heidelberg-draengt-auf-mehr-Obduktionen-von-Geimpften-id60235361.html
*
*
Testing conducted among Massachusetts residents during an outbreak in Provincetown, a popular weekend getaway spot, from July 3 to 17 found that 75% of those infected were fully vaccinated, in a state where 69% of adults were fully vaccinated.
Celo CNN poroča o 74% okuženih, ki so bili cepljeni: https://www.facebook.com/701694363207484/videos/2697460173880667
*

During July 2021, 469 cases of COVID-19 associated with multiple summer events and large public gatherings in a town in Barnstable County, Massachusetts, were identified among Massachusetts residents; vaccination coverage among eligible Massachusetts residents was 69%. Approximately three quarters (346; 74%) of cases occurred in fully vaccinated persons (those who had completed a 2-dose course of mRNA vaccine [Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna] or had received a single dose of Janssen [Johnson & Johnson] vaccine ≥14 days before exposure). Genomic sequencing of specimens from 133 patients identified the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, in 119 (89%) and the Delta AY.3 sublineage in one (1%). Overall, 274 (79%) vaccinated patients with breakthrough infection were symptomatic. Among five COVID-19 patients who were hospitalized, four were fully vaccinated; no deaths were reported. Real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) cycle threshold (Ct) values in specimens from 127 vaccinated persons with breakthrough cases were similar to those from 84 persons who were unvaccinated, not fully vaccinated, or whose vaccination status was unknown (median = 22.77 and 21.54, respectively). The Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 is highly transmissible (1); vaccination is the most important strategy to prevent severe illness and death. On July 27, CDC recommended that all persons, including those who are fully vaccinated, should wear masks in indoor public settings in areas where COVID-19 transmission is high or substantial.* Findings from this investigation suggest that even jurisdictions without substantial or high COVID-19 transmission might consider expanding prevention strategies, including masking in indoor public settings regardless of vaccination status, given the potential risk of infection during attendance at large public gatherings that include travelers from many areas with differing levels of transmission.

During July 3–17, 2021, multiple summer events and large public gatherings were held in a town in Barnstable County, Massachusetts, that attracted thousands of tourists from across the United States. Beginning July 10, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MA DPH) received reports of an increase in COVID-19 cases among persons who reside in or recently visited Barnstable County, including in fully vaccinated persons. Persons with COVID-19 reported attending densely packed indoor and outdoor events at venues that included bars, restaurants, guest houses, and rental homes. On July 3, MA DPH had reported a 14-day average COVID-19 incidence of zero cases per 100,000 persons per day in residents of the town in Barnstable County; by July 17, the 14-day average incidence increased to 177 cases per 100,000 persons per day in residents of the town (2).

During July 10–26, using travel history data from the state COVID-19 surveillance system, MA DPH identified a cluster of cases among Massachusetts residents. Additional cases were identified by local health jurisdictions through case investigation. COVID-19 cases were matched with the state immunization registry. A cluster-associated case was defined as receipt of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test (nucleic acid amplification or antigen) result ≤14 days after travel to or residence in the town in Barnstable County since July 3. COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough cases were those in fully vaccinated Massachusetts residents (those with documentation from the state immunization registry of completion of COVID-19 vaccination as recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, ≥14 days before exposure). Specimens were submitted for whole genome sequencing§ to either the Massachusetts State Public Health Laboratory or the Broad Institute of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University. Ct values were obtained for 211 specimens tested using a noncommercial real-time RT-PCR panel for SARS-CoV-2 performed under Emergency Use Authorization at the Broad Institute Clinical Research Sequencing Platform. On July 15, MA DPH issued the first of two Epidemic Information Exchange notifications to identify additional cases among residents of U.S. jurisdictions outside Massachusetts associated with recent travel to the town in Barnstable County during July 2021. This activity was reviewed by CDC and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.

By July 26, a total of 469 COVID-19 cases were identified among Massachusetts residents; dates of positive specimen collection ranged from July 6 through July 25 (Figure 1). Most cases occurred in males (85%); median age was 40 years (range = <1–76 years). Nearly one half (199; 42%) reported residence in the town in Barnstable County. Overall, 346 (74%) persons with COVID-19 reported symptoms consistent with COVID-19.** Five were hospitalized; as of July 27, no deaths were reported. One hospitalized patient (age range = 50–59 years) was not vaccinated and had multiple underlying medical conditions.†† Four additional, fully vaccinated patients§§ aged 20–70 years were also hospitalized, two of whom had underlying medical conditions. Initial genomic sequencing of specimens from 133 patients identified the Delta variant in 119 (89%) cases and the Delta AY.3 sublineage in one (1%) case; genomic sequencing was not successful for 13 (10%) specimens.

Among the 469 cases in Massachusetts residents, 346 (74%) occurred in persons who were fully vaccinated; of these, 301 (87%) were male, with a median age of 42 years. Vaccine products received by persons experiencing breakthrough infections were Pfizer-BioNTech (159; 46%), Moderna (131; 38%), and Janssen (56; 16%); among fully vaccinated persons in the Massachusetts general population, 56% had received Pfizer-BioNTech, 38% had received Moderna, and 7% had received Janssen vaccine products. Among persons with breakthrough infection, 274 (79%) reported signs or symptoms, with the most common being cough, headache, sore throat, myalgia, and fever. Among fully vaccinated symptomatic persons, the median interval from completion of ≥14 days after the final vaccine dose to symptom onset was 86 days (range = 6–178 days). Among persons with breakthrough infection, four (1.2%) were hospitalized, and no deaths were reported. Real-time RT-PCR Ct values in specimens from 127 fully vaccinated patients (median = 22.77) were similar to those among 84 patients who were unvaccinated, not fully vaccinated, or whose vaccination status was unknown (median = 21.54) (Figure 2).

Transmission mitigation measures included broadening testing recommendations for persons with travel or close contact with a cluster-associated case, irrespective of vaccination status; local recommendations for mask use in indoor settings, irrespective of vaccination status; deployment of state-funded mobile testing and vaccination units in the town in Barnstable County; and informational outreach to visitors and residents. In this tourism-focused community, the Community Tracing Collaborative¶¶ conducted outreach to hospitality workers, an international workforce requiring messaging in multiple languages.

The call from MA DPH for cases resulted in additional reports of cases among residents of 22 other states who had traveled to the town in Barnstable County during July 3–17, as well as reports of secondary transmission; further analyses are ongoing. As of July 3, estimated COVID-19 vaccination coverage among the eligible population in Massachusetts was 69% (3). Further investigations and characterization of breakthrough infections and vaccine effectiveness among this highly vaccinated population are ongoing.

Top

Discussion

The SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant is highly transmissible (1), and understanding determinants of transmission, including human behavior and vaccine effectiveness, is critical to developing prevention strategies. Multipronged prevention strategies are needed to reduce COVID-19–related morbidity and mortality (4).

The findings in this report are subject to at least four limitations. First, data from this report are insufficient to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2, including the Delta variant, during this outbreak. As population-level vaccination coverage increases, vaccinated persons are likely to represent a larger proportion of COVID-19 cases. Second, asymptomatic breakthrough infections might be underrepresented because of detection bias. Third, demographics of cases likely reflect those of attendees at the public gatherings, as events were marketed to adult male participants; further study is underway to identify other population characteristics among cases, such as additional demographic characteristics and underlying health conditions including immunocompromising conditions.*** MA DPH, CDC, and affected jurisdictions are collaborating in this response; MA DPH is conducting additional case investigations, obtaining samples for genomic sequencing, and linking case information with laboratory data and vaccination history. Finally, Ct values obtained with SARS-CoV-2 qualitative RT-PCR diagnostic tests might provide a crude correlation to the amount of virus present in a sample and can also be affected by factors other than viral load.††† Although the assay used in this investigation was not validated to provide quantitative results, there was no significant difference between the Ct values of samples collected from breakthrough cases and the other cases. This might mean that the viral load of vaccinated and unvaccinated persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 is also similar. However, microbiological studies are required to confirm these findings.

Event organizers and local health jurisdictions should continually assess the need for additional measures, including limiting capacity at gatherings or event postponement, based on current rates of COVID-19 transmission, population vaccination coverage, and other factors.§§§ On July 27, CDC released recommendations that all persons, including those who are fully vaccinated, should wear masks in indoor public settings in areas where COVID-19 transmission is high or substantial. Findings from this investigation suggest that even jurisdictions without substantial or high COVID-19 transmission might consider expanding prevention strategies, including masking in indoor public settings regardless of vaccination status, given the potential risk of infection during attendance at large public gatherings that include travelers from many areas with differing levels of transmission.

*

https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/08/06/new-latest-phe-report-shows-the-covid-19-vaccines-are-increasing-the-risk-of-hospitalisation-and-death-due-to-covid-19-significantly/?fbclid=IwAR2YWzwTjenFrGn5ZyE6pgTbPEekL_60F8jlXoMcfmvvfevB6c9LaQFrFM8

The latest Public Health England technical briefing on Covid-19 variants of concern has been published and it reveals that up to the 2nd August 2021, 65% of all alleged Covid-19 deaths since February 2021 have been people who were vaccinated against the disease.

The report, which is the 20th update to be released, also shows that the risk of hospitalisation and death is astronomically higher if you have been fully vaccinated and catch the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

According to the PHE report, 300,010 cases of the delta Covid-19 variant have been confirmed since the 1st February 2021.

Of these roughly 50% were people who had not been vaccinated against Covid-19, with a total of 151,054 cases being recorded in the past 7 months.

Roughly 8% were people who’d had one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine less than 21 days prior to testing positive, with a total of 24,018 cases being recorded.

Roughly 15% were people who’d had one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine more than 21 days prior to testing positive, with a total of 46,089 cases being recorded.

And roughly 15% were people who were fully vaccinated prior to testing positive, with a total of 47,008 cases.

In all people who’d had at least one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine account for 39% of all confirmed cases of the Delta Covid-19 variant since February 1st 2021 up to 2nd August 2021.

However, the Covid-19 vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission. This was recently confirmed in a document published (see here) by the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE), in which they said research should now concentrate on producing a vaccine that prevents transmission and infection due to the current vaccines not preventing infection in most people.

You’ll have noticed above how SAGE stated they “feel that current vaccines are excellent for reducing the risk of hospital admission”. Unfortunately for them, “feeling” something isn’t enough, as the Public Health England data does not support that “feeling”.

The report shows that since the 1st February 2021 out of the 151,054 people infected with Covid-19 who had not been vaccinated, a total of 2,960 of the group ended up being admitted to hospital. This translates to 1.95% of all confirmed cases in the unvaccinated group up to the 2nd August 2021.

Since the 1st February 2021 out of the 24,018 people infected with Covid-19 who’d had one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine less than 21 days prior to their confirmed infection, a total of 234 of the group ended up being admitted to hospital. This translates to 0.97% of all infections in this group up to the 2nd August 2021.

Since the 1st February 2021 out of the 46,089 people infected with Covid-19 who’d had one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine more than 21 days prior to their confirmed infection, a total of 528 people ended up being admitted to hospital.. This translates to 1.14% of all infection in this group up to the 2nd August 2021.

Finally, since the 1st February 2021 out of the 47,008 people infected with Covid-19 who were fully vaccinated, a total of 1,355 of the group ended up being admitted to hospital. This translates to 2.882% of all cases in the fully vaccinated group.

This means a much higher percentage of people are being hospitalised after being infected with Covid-19 once they are fully vaccinated, compared to if they have not had a single dose of the Covid-19 vaccine at all.

The Covid-19 vaccines are meant to reduce the risk of hospitalisation by up to 95%. The Public Health England data is showing us that the Covid-19 vaccines actually increase the risk of hospitalisation by 48%.

But perhaps SAGE’s “feelings” are justified in terms of the Covid-19 vaccine reducing the risk of death?

Well the Public Health England report shows us that since the 1st February 2021, out of the 151,054 cases and 2,960 hospitalisations of the unvaccinated group, a total of 253 people have sadly died. This translates to 0.167% of cases and 8.54% of hospitalisations within the unvaccinated group up to the 2nd August 2021.

Since the 1st February 2021 out of the 24,018 people infected with Covid-19 who’d had one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine less than 21 days prior to their confirmed infection, a total of 10 people have sadly died. This translates to 0.04% of all cases and 4.2% of all hospitalisations within this group up to the 2nd August 2021.

Since the 1st February 2021 out of the 46,089 people infected with Covid-19 who’d had one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine more than 21 days prior to their confirmed infection, a total of 69 people have sadly died. This translates to 0.15% of all cases and 13% of all hospitalisations within this group up to the 2nd August 2021.

Finally, since the 1st February 2021 out of the 47,008 people infected with Covid-19 who were fully vaccinated, a total of 402 people sadly died. This translates to 0.85% of all cases and 29.6% of all hospitalisations within the fully vaccinated group.

This means a much higher percentage of people are dying after being infected with Covid-19 and after being hospitalised with Covid-19 once they are fully vaccinated, compared to if they have not had a single dose of a Covid-19 vaccine at all.

The Public Health England data shows that rather than the Covid-19 vaccines reducing the risk of death due to Covid-19 by 95% when exposed to the Covid-19 virus, they in fact increase the risk of death by 431.25% when exposed to the Covid-19 virus.

It also shows that the risk of death once hospitalised with Covid-19 if fully vaccinated increases by 262.5%.

The Covid-19 vaccines do not prevent infection and they do not prevent transmission, this is a fact. Even SAGE have officially stated this in their recent published paper. They are supposed to reduce the risk of hospitalisation and death when exposed to the Covid-19 virus, but the Public Health England data clearly shows the vaccines are having the opposite effect and are actually increasing the risk of hospitalisation and death significantly.

Yet for some reason authorities in the United Kingdom have decided to implement a vaccine passport system from the Autumn, enshrine a no jab, no job policy in law for carers – despite the jabs not preventing transmission, and have outrageously decided to start giving the Covid-19 vaccines to children, despite their risk of hospitalisation and death being so small that the number is negligible.

The evidence shows that the Covid-19 vaccines are either not working, or they are making recipients worse – possibly due to antibody-dependent enhancement which the world was warned about.

We are in the middle of Summer so at the moment the number of deaths are low, yet 65% of deaths since the 1st February are people who had been vaccinated. Therefore, the evidence suggests this winter is going to be an incredibly difficult one for an extraordinary amount of people.

https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/08/06/new-latest-phe-report-shows-the-covid-19-vaccines-are-increasing-the-risk-of-hospitalisation-and-death-due-to-covid-19-significantly/?fbclid=IwAR2YWzwTjenFrGn5ZyE6pgTbPEekL_60F8jlXoMcfmvvfevB6c9LaQFrFM8

*

https://tapnewswire.com/2021/08/alarming-data-from-phe-shows-the-fatality-rate-in-the-vaccinated-under-50s-is-57-greater-than-in-the-unvaccinated/

*

https://yournews.com/2021/08/06/2196166/covid-1984ever-israel-australia-report-95-99-hospitalized-fully-vaccinated/?fbclid=IwAR0OskgmsCg5gXvKbKu3kEPsWeu1JgW-WOCqZ-lVz3nU-E6sfvevYxmMkkQ

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/israel-australia-report-95-99-hospitalized-are-fully-vaccinated/?fbclid=IwAR0ux4M-jMgM6ppi5XuzBEZamzd4LaO2a1LslNmby-6JhOEYiNoUR0qNEik

*

Znanstveniki še ne vedo, ali je različica kappa bolj kužna od ostalih. "Skrb vzbujajoče je to, da so oskrbovanci umrli kljub temu, da so bili polno cepljeni," je dejal Van Ranst.

https://siol.net/novice/svet/v-belgiji-umrlo-sedem-polno-cepljenih-starostnikov-558626?fbclid=IwAR30jaMpFWbUO1rE6p3oOgENoDEv4v16WSV9-PGC_q9wOeuf6qUv89X2KJI

*

Tjaša Vuzem FB 11.8. 2021

INCIDENCA in PRECEPLJENOST
Iz tabele je razvidno, da je najbolj precepljena država Gibraltar, ki ima obenem tudi najvišjo trenutno incidenco.
Manjša kot je precepljenost, manjša je incidenca.

Michael Green has filed a class action lawsuit at first representing 1,200 first responders against the Governor & Mayor's vaccine mandates with thousands more expected to join.

Michael Green says that the vaccine is killing people all around the country. There are effective treatments. It's unnecessary to test asymptomatic people because the CDC says that they don't spread the virus.

Honolulu Fire Captain Kaimi Pelekai gives an emotional testimony about losing his job because he doesn't want to put this experimental vaccine in his body that is killing people.

*

https://www.t-online.de/gesundheit/krankheiten-symptome/id_90550128/corona-impfung-pathologe-fordert-mehr-obduktionen-von-geimpften.html

Veliko število neprijavljenih primerov?  

Cepljena mrtva korona: Strokovnjak zahteva več obdukcij

08. 01. 2021,

Da bi bolje razumeli učinke cepiv, bi morali avtopsirati še veliko trupel. To zahteva patolog Peter Schirmacher. Predvideva precejšnje število neprijavljenih smrti zaradi cepiva. Glavni patolog na univerzi v Heidelbergu Peter Schirmacher poziva k mnogo več obdukcij cepljenih ljudi. Poleg smrti zaradi korone bi morali pogosteje pregledati tudi trupla ljudi, ki umrejo zaradi cepljenja, pravi Schirmacher iz nemške tiskovne agencije v Stuttgartu.

Direktor Patološkega inštituta v Heidelbergu celo opozarja na veliko število neprijavljenih primerov smrti zaradi cepljenja in se pritožuje: Patologi ne opazijo ničesar pri večini bolnikov, ki po cepljenju umrejo in po možnosti. Vendar se drugi znanstveniki glede tega ne strinjajo z njim, prav tako Stalna komisija za cepljenje (Stiko) in Inštitut Paul Ehrlich.

Obdukcijski projekt izboljšuje zdravljenje

Že leto dni se smrt bolnikov s koronavirusom obiskuje na univerzitetnih klinikah na jugozahodu, da bi bolje razumeli bolezen. Država podpira obdukcijsko raziskavo univerzitetnih patologij Covid-19 z okoli 1,8 milijona evrov. Schirmacher vodi projekt obdukcije.

Doslej več kot 200 obdukcij je med drugim privedlo do boljšega zdravljenja in prezračevanja bolnikov s covidom, pravi. "Tu pridobljeno znanje torej pomaga pri boljšem in uspešnejšem zdravljenju bolnih ljudi in pri reševanju življenj," pravi ministrica za znanost Theresia Bauer (Zeleni). Schirmacher, član Nacionalne akademije znanosti Leopoldina od leta 2012, upa, da se bo financiranje nadaljevalo tudi prihodnje leto.

Raziščite redke stranske učinke

Zdravnik zdaj želi bolj redke, resne stranske učinke do dna cepljenja - na primer tromboze možganskih žil ali avtoimunskih bolezni. Problem z njegovega vidika: cepljeni ljudje običajno ne umrejo pod kliničnim opazovanjem.

"Zdravnik, ki pregleda truplo, ne vzpostavi konteksta s cepljenjem in potrdi naravno smrt, bolnik pa je pokopan," poroča Schirmacher. "Ali pa potrdi nejasno vrsto smrti, državni tožilec pa ne vidi krivde tretje osebe in truplo spusti za pokop."

Strokovnjak: 30 do 40 odstotkov jih je umrlo zaradi cepljenja

V Baden-Württembergu so zato patologi sodelovali z državnimi tožilci, policijo in zdravniki rezidenti, poroča Schirmacher. Obseženo je bilo že več kot 40 ljudi, ki so umrli v dveh tednih po cepljenju. Schirmacher predvideva, da jih je 30 do 40 odstotkov umrlo zaradi cepljenja.

Po njegovem mnenju je pogostost usodnih posledic cepljenj podcenjena - politično eksplozivna izjava v času, ko kampanja cepljenja izgublja zagon, varianta delta se hitro širi in razpravlja o omejitvah za necepljene .

Paul Ehrlich Institute nasprotuje glavnemu patologu

Schirmacher je od drugih znanstvenikov prejel jasno protislovje. Izjave, da je trenutno premalo znanja o stranskih učinkih in da so nevarnosti cepljenja podcenjene, so nerazumljive, je dejal Inštitut Paul Ehrlich.

Zlasti za resne reakcije, ki vključujejo tudi, ko oseba umre po cepljenju, obstaja obveznost prijavljanja po Zakonu o zaščiti pred okužbami. "Ne poznam nobenih podatkov, ki bi omogočili razumno izjavo, in ne predvidevam neprijavljene številke," je dejal vodja stalne komisije za cepljenje Thomas Mertens.

Veliko število neprijavljenih smrti?

Ni razloga za domnevo o velikem številu neprijavljenih zapletov pri cepljenju ali celo smrti, je poudaril imunolog Christian Bogdan iz univerzitetne bolnišnice Erlangen. "Prav tako ne more biti govora o zanemarjanju možnih nevarnosti cepiv proti Covid 19."

Zlasti zadnji tedni in meseci so pokazali, da nadzorni sistem dobro deluje. V Nemčiji so na primer redki pojav tromboze možganskih žil po cepljenju z zdravilom Astrazeneca (1 do 2 primera na 100.000 cepljenj) prepoznali kot zaplet, pravi Bogdan.

"Kolegi se vsekakor motijo"

Schirmacher vztraja pri svojem mnenju. "Vaši kolegi se vsekakor motijo, ker tega posebnega vprašanja ne znajo kompetentno oceniti," je odgovoril. Ne želi širiti panike in nikakor ne nasprotuje cepljenju, pravi profesor, ki pravi, da se je sam cepil proti koroni.

Cepljenje je bistven del boja proti virusu, pojasnjuje. Vendar morate individualno pretehtati zdravstvene razloge za cepljenje. Z njegovega vidika je "individualna zaščita" prepletena z idejo hitrega cepljenja družbe.

Zvezno združenje poziva k več obdukcij

Zvezno združenje nemških patologov si prizadeva tudi za več obdukcij cepljenih ljudi. Le tako bi lahko izključili ali dokazali povezave med smrtjo in cepljenjem, pravi Johannes Friemann, vodja delovne skupine za obdukcijo v združenju.

Z njegovega vidika pa se izvaja premalo obdukcij, da bi lahko govorili o neprijavljenem številu. "Ti še nič ne veš." S tem bi morali biti seznanjeni zdravniki splošne medicine in zdravstveni organi. Zvezne dežele bi morale zdravstvenim organom naročiti, naj na kraju naročijo obdukcijo. Zvezno združenje patologov je to zahtevalo v pismu ministru za zdravje Jensu Spahnu (CDU) marca Brez odgovora, pravi Friemann.

*

https://www.logicno.com/politika/postotak-smrtnosti-od-cjepiva-u-velikoj-britaniji-visi-od-virusa-sluzbene-lazi-novac-kvari-medicinu.html

*

How CDC Manipulated Data to Create ‘Pandemic of the Unvaxxed’ Narrative

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the unvaccinated make up 95% to 99% of COVID hospitalizations. But in a news clip shared by Fox News host Laura Ingraham, CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky reveals how that data is “grossly misleading.”

Story at-a-glance:

  • According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the White House and most mainstream media, what we have now is a “pandemic of the unvaccinated,” with 95% to 99% of COVID-related hospitalizations and deaths being attributed to the unvaccinated.
  • To achieve that statistic, the CDC included hospitalization and mortality data from January through June. The vast majority of the U.S. population was unvaccinated during that timeframe.
  • By Jan. 1 only 0.5% of the U.S. population had received a COVID shot. By mid-April, an estimated 31% had received one or more shots and as of June 15, 48.7% were fully “vaccinated.”
  • Natural immunity offers robust protection against all variants, whereas vaccine-induced immunity can’t. The reason for this is because when you recover from the natural infection, you have both antibodies and T cells against all parts of the virus, not just the spike protein.
  • According to Dr. Anthony Fauci, the Delta variant is both more transmissible and more dangerous than the original virus and previous variants, but real-world data show it is actually weaker and far less dangerous, even though it does spread more easily.
  • According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the White House and most mainstream media, what we have now is a “pandemic of the unvaccinated.”

    According to the official narrative, 99% of COVID-19 deaths and 95% of COVID-related hospitalizations are occurring among the unvaccinated. In a July 16 White House press briefing, CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky claimed “over 97% of people who are entering the hospital right now are unvaccinated.”

    But as reported by Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham on “The Ingraham Angle,” “that statistic is grossly misleading,” and in an Aug. 5 video statement, Walensky inadvertently revealed how that 95% to 99% statistic was created.

    Grossly misleading data manipulation

    As it turns out, to achieve those statistics, the CDC included hospitalization and mortality data from January through June 2021. It does not include more recent data or data related to the Delta variant, which is now the most prevalent strain in circulation. The problem is, the vast majority of the U.S.population was unvaccinated during that timeframe.

    By Jan. 1, only 0.5% of the U.S. population had received a COVID shot. By mid-April, an estimated 31% had received one or more shots, and as of June 15, 48.7% were fully “vaccinated.” Keep in mind that you’re not “fully vaccinated” until two weeks after your second dose (in the case of Pfizer or Moderna), which is given six weeks after your first shot. This is according to the CDC.

    So, those receiving an initial dose in June, for example, won’t be “fully vaccinated” until eight weeks later, sometime in July or August.

    By using statistics from a time period when the U.S. as a whole was largely unvaccinated, the CDC is now claiming we’re in a “pandemic of the unvaccinated,” in an effort to demonize those who still have not agreed to receive this experimental gene modification injection.

    Selective pressure promotes emergence of new variants

    Here’s what Canadian viral immunologist and vaccine researcher Dr. Byram Bridle told Ingraham about the claim that we’re in a pandemic of the unvaxxed, and that the unvaccinated are hotbeds for dangerous variants:

    “Absolutely, it’s untrue to be calling this a pandemic of the unvaccinated. And it’s certainly untrue … that the unvaccinated are somehow driving the emergence of the novel variants. This goes against every scientific principle that we understand.

    “The reality is, the nature of the vaccines we are using right now, and the way we’re rolling them out, are going to be applying selective pressure to this virus to promote the emergence of new variants. Again, this is based on sound principles.

    “We have to look no further than … the emergence of antibiotic resistance … The principle is this: If you have a biological entity that is prone to mutation — and the SARS-CoV-2, like all coronaviruses is prone to mutation — and you apply a narrowly focused selective pressure that is nonlethal, and you do this over a long period of time, this is the recipe for driving the emergence of novel variants.

    “This is exactly what we’re doing. Our vaccines are focused on a single protein of the virus, so the virus only has to alter one protein, and the vaccines don’t come close to providing sterilizing immunity.

    “People who are vaccinated still get infected, it only seems particularly good at blunting the disease, and what that tells you therefore is that these vaccines in the vast majority of people are applying a nonlethal pressure, narrowly focused on one protein, and the vaccine rollout is occurring over a long period of time. That’s the recipe for driving variants.”

    Natural immunity offers far superior protection

    Bridle also explains why natural immunity offers robust protection against all variants, whereas vaccine-induced immunity can’t. When you acquire the infection naturally, your body develops antibodies against ALL of the viral proteins whereas the COVID shots only trigger antibodies against one, namely the spike protein.

As mentioned above, when you have antibodies against just one of the viral proteins, the virus only needs to mutate that one protein in order to evade your immune system. When you have natural immunity, on the other hand, your antibodies will recognize all parts of the virus, so even if the spike protein is mutated, your body will recognize other parts of the virus and mount an attack against those.

That SARS-CoV-2 works the same way other viruses do was shown in a Nature Reviews Immunology study by Alessandro Sette and Shane Crotty, published in October 2020. The study, “Cross-Reactive Memory T Cells and Herd Immunity to SARS-CoV-2” argued that naturally-acquired immunity against SARS-CoV-2 is potent, long-lasting and very broad in scope, as you develop both antibodies and T cells that target multiple components of the virus and not just one.

If we are to depend on vaccine-induced immunity, as public health officials are urging us to do, we’ll end up on a never-ending booster treadmill. Boosters will absolutely be necessary, as the shot offers such narrow protection against a single protein of the virus. Already, data around the world show vaccine-induced protection is waning rapidly in the face of new variants, and Moderna has publicly stated that the need for additional boosters is expected.

How dangerous is the Delta variant?

According to Dr. Anthony Fauci, the Delta variant is both more transmissible and more dangerous than the original virus and previous variants. July 4, 2021, he told NBC News:

“It is more effective and efficient in its ability to transmit from person to person. And studies that we’ve seen where they have been the variant that’s dominated in other countries, it’s clear that it appears to be more lethal in the sense of more serious — allow you to get more serious disease leading to hospitalization, and in some cases leading to deaths.”

In a June 29 interview, Fauci called the Delta variant “a game-changer” for unvaccinated people, warning it will devastate the unvaccinated population while vaccinated individuals are protected against it.

Remember, Fauci is not a clinician and has never treated someone infected with SARS-CoV-2. Other health experts and practicing physicians who treat COVID-19 patients disagree with Fauci’s claims, arguing that not only is the Delta variant not more dangerous, it’s certainly not more dangerous for the unvaccinated.

As reported by Ingraham in June 2021 (video above), there’s an evolutionary genetics theory called Muller’s Ratchet, which states that as an outbreak starts to peter out, the virus tends to mutate into a more transmissible form, but at the same time it grows weaker, causing far less serious infection. According to epidemiologist and cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, this is exactly what we’re seeing. He told Ingraham:

“The good news is on the 18th of June, the United Kingdom presented their 16th report11 on the mutations — and they’re doing a great job, much better than our CDC — and what they demonstrated is that the Delta is more contagious but it’s far less deadly, far less worrisome. In fact, it’s a much weaker virus than both the U.K. [Alpha] and the South African [Beta] variants.

Spike mutations render vaccinated vulnerable to delta

Importantly, the Delta variant contains three different mutations, all in the spike protein. This, McCullough explains, allows this variant to evade the immune responses in those who have received the COVID jabs — but not those who have natural immunity which, again, is much broader. In a June 30 appearance on Fox News, McCullough stated:

“It is very clear from the UK Technical Briefing13 that was published June 18th that the vaccine provides no protection against the Delta variant. It’s a very mild variant.

“Whether you get the vaccine or not, patients will get some very mild symptoms like a cold and they can be easily managed … Patients who have severe symptoms or at high risk, we can use simple drug combinations at home and get them through the illness. So, there’s no reason now to push vaccinations.”

Children’s Health Defense chief scientific officer Brian Hooker, Ph.D., has echoed McCullough’s sentiments. The Defender quotes Hooker:

“What we’re seeing is virus evolution 101. Viruses like to survive, so killing the host (i.e. the human who is infected) defeats the purpose because killing the host kills the virus, too. For this reason, new variants of viruses that circulate widely through the population tend to become more transmissive but less pathogenic. In other words, they will spread more easily from person to person, but they will cause less damage to the host.

The vaccine focuses on the spike protein, whereas natural immunity focuses on the entire virus.

“Natural immunity — with a more diverse array of antibodies and T-cell receptors — will provide better protection overall as it has more targets in which to attack the virus, whereas vaccine-derived immunity only focuses on one portion of the virus, in this case, the spike protein. Once that portion of the virus has mutated sufficiently, the vaccine no longer is effective.”

Real-world data show most of infected are fully ‘vaccinated’

Real-world data from areas with high COVID jab rates show the complete converse of what media, the CDC and White House officials are telling us. In addition to the British Technical Briefing No. 16, cited above, we have additional data from Israel, Scotland, Massachusetts and Gibraltar:

  • Aug.1, 2021, director of Israel’s Public Health Services, Dr. Sharon Alroy-Preis, announced half of all COVID-19 infections were among the fully vaccinated. Signs of more serious disease among fully vaccinated are also emerging, she said, particularly in those over the age of 60.

A few days later, Aug. 5, Dr. Kobi Haviv, director of the Herzog Hospital in Jerusalem, appeared on Channel 13 News, reporting that 95% of severely ill COVID-19 patients are fully vaccinated, and that they make up 85% to 90% of COVID-related hospitalizations overall. As of Aug. 2, 66.9% of Israelis had received at least one dose of Pfizer’s injection, which is used exclusively in Israel; 62.2% had received two doses.

  • In Scotland, official data on hospitalizations and deaths show 87% of those who have died from COVID-19 in the third wave that began in early July were vaccinated.
  • A CDC investigation of an outbreak in Barnstable County, Massachusetts, between July 6 through July 25, found 74% of those who received a diagnosis of COVID19, and 80% of hospitalizations, were among the fully vaccinated. Most, but not all, had the Delta variant of the virus.

The CDC also found that fully vaccinated individuals who contract the infection have as high a viral load in their nasal passages as unvaccinated individuals who get infected. This means the vaccinated are just as infectious as the unvaccinated.

  • In Gibraltar, which has a 99% COVID jab compliance rate, COVID cases have risen by 2,500% since June 1.

While those who benefit from keeping the pandemic going would like you to cower in fear at the thought of the Delta variant, there’s really no evidence that it’s any worse than the original. It’s more transmissible, yes, but far less dangerous, as its primary symptoms are that of a regular cold.

According to Harvard and Stanford professors, the actual number of Americans dying from or with COVID-19 are actually at an all-time low, so alarmism is uncalled for.

And, as for viral social media posts by doctors and nurses claiming hospitals are overflowing with unvaccinated COVID patients, don’t believe them. Most are bots. We’ve repeatedly seen evidence that fearmongering is being spread not by real people but by fake accounts run by artificial intelligence. This includes blue check accounts. Here’s a sampling of recent bot farm tweets trying to scare everyone:

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cdc-manipulated-data-create-pandemic-unvaxxed-narrative/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=fd648cde-52b5-4a0d-b910-c7dca0e40f86&fbclid=IwAR2uFn_zl9ZqROyaGVMMn-pk_XVGkiMO35Ytny__on5HfnDaSPLnR6LnCQ8

*

67 necepljenih in 3.124 cepljenih  je bilo hospitaliziranih od 1.3. do 1. 8. 2021 

Vir: A kanal,17. 8. 2021 ob 18. uri

Kdo zavaja?

*

Podatki javnega zdravstva na Škotskem dejansko kažejo, da popolnoma cepljeni ljudje umirajo zaradi Covid-19 5,5-krat pogosteje kot necepljeni.
Iz preglednice 15 poročila Public Health Scotland je razvidno, da je bilo v tednu, ki se je začel 10. julija 2021, 7.575 pozitivnih primerov med necepljeno populacijo. Devetnajst dni pozneje, v tednu, ki se je začel 29. julija, je bilo med necepljenim prebivalstvom 14 smrtnih primerov. To pomeni, da je stopnja smrtnosti 0,33 %.
Ista preglednica nam kaže tudi, da je bilo v tednu, ki se je začel 10. julija 2021, med popolnoma cepljenim prebivalstvom 3 738 primerov okužbe s SARS CoV-2. (jasen dokaz, da cepiva ne preprečujejo okužbe ali prenosa). Devetnajst dni pozneje, v tednu, ki se je začel 29. julija, je bilo med popolnoma cepljeno populacijo 34 smrtnih primerov. To pomeni, da je stopnja smrtnosti 1,76 %.
Zato je stopnja umrljivosti med popolnoma cepljenimi 5,3-krat višja kot med necepljenimi osebami, ki so domnevno okužene z virusom Covid-19.
To je jasen dokaz za od protiteles odvisnega učineka (ADE). Stopnja umrljivosti je bistveno višja med popolnoma cepljenimi in sredi poletja se pojavlja vse večji val smrti, kar je v popolnem nasprotju z zgodovinsko normo, škotsko javno zdravstvo pa se na vse pretege trudi to prikriti z manipulacijo številk z datumskim razponom, ki ga uporablja.
*
DAJMO TO V VELIKEM ŠTEVILU POVEDAT MINISTRU POKLUKARJU, DR. LOGARJEVI IN DR. BEOVIČEVI, RAVNATELJEM ŠOL IN VRTCEV,...
Profesor dr. Andrew Pollard, vodilni znanstvenik, ki je vodil ekipo, ki je ustvarila cepivo AstreZenece, pravi, da je čredno imunost, zdaj ko za c19 obolevajo tudi polno cepljeni, nemogoče doseči. Pravi da zato tudi masovno testiranje ljudi brez simptomov ni več smiselno in da bi od štetja okuženih morali preiti k štetju obolelih, ki potrebujejo zdravniško pomoč. Sicer, pravi, bomo sami sebe ustrahovali z visokimi številkami okuženih, ki pa se ne bodo pretvorile v realno breme bolezni ...Željka Toplek Luzar
*
Minister za zdravje Poklukar: cepljeni bodo polnili bolnišnice: https://www.facebook.com/martin.lesjak.9/videos/4349055031828816
*
V Izraelu je med 515 hospitaliziranimi bolniki zaradi covida 301 cepljen z dvema odmerkoma Pfizerja, kar pomeni, da je cepljenih skoraj 60 odstotkov vseh zaradi covida hospitaliziranih pacientov.


*
*

As the number of breakthrough COVID cases continues to climb, there is growing concern fully vaccinated people may be more vulnerable to serious illness than previously thought — and some fully vaccinated people now sick with the virus are speaking out.

According to the most recent data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), there were 9,716 breakthrough cases resulting in hospitalization or death as of Aug. 16. However, the agency states those numbers are underreported. On May 1, the CDC made a decision to stop tracking all breakthrough cases and instead only track cases in the fully vaccinated that resulted in hospitalization or death.

That leaves public health officials without the full data that can answer questions as the new Delta variant spreads.

In an interview with PBS News HourJessica Malaty Rivera, an infectious disease epidemiologist and research fellow at Boston Children’s Hospital and former science communications lead at the COVID Tracking Project, said not tracking breakthrough data with as much granularity as we would hope is “basically creating blind spots in our understanding of the true impact of the virus, especially the variants that are circulating so widely in the United States.”

Rivera said she has yet to see an explicit explanation for why the CDC stopped tracking all breakthrough cases. “I’ve heard rumors of things like lack of resources, lack of funding, lack of staff. But to me, it seems pretty, from an epidemiology standpoint, not defensible,” she said.

breakthrough case refers to a person who is diagnosed with COVID after being fully vaccinated. A person is considered fully vaccinated 14 days after receiving the second dose of either the Pfizer or Moderna COVID vaccine, or two weeks after receiving the single-dose Johnson & Johnson (J&J) vaccine.

The New York Times recently published data from seven states — California, Colorado, Massachusetts, Oregon, Utah, Vermont  and Virginia — that keeps particularly detailed records on breakthrough cases.

Analysis showed that in six of the states, breakthrough infections made up 18% to 28% of all newly diagnosed cases of COVID in the past several weeks, and 12% to 24% of all COVID-related hospitalizations, with reported deaths higher than the CDC’s original estimate of .5%.

The figures on non-hospitalized breakthrough infections are also assumed to be underestimations since many fully vaccinated people who become infected may not feel sick enough to be tested for the virus, The Times reported.

About 30% of the new COVID cases in Los Angeles are breakthrough cases, Deadline reported. The number is up from 13% in July and 5% in April.

As of Aug. 17, more than 12,500 fully vaccinated Massachusetts residents had tested positive for COVID and an additional 18 had died, according to NBC Boston.

Fully vaccinated celebrities, elected officials speak out after getting COVID

*

Sveži podatki NIJZ kažejo, da se novi Covid pozitivni primeri med polno cepljenimi drastično večajo. Bistveno hitreje kot med necepljenimi.
V razmaku dveh mesecev se je tedensko število novih primerov med necepljenimi povečalo za 14,6 krat, medtem, ko se je število novih primerov med polno cepljenimi povečalo kar za 86,3 krat. Tako je v včerajšnjem številu novih pozitivnih Covid primerov že skoraj 23% polno cepljenih oseb. Za primerjavo, cca. dva meseca nazaj, je bilo novih Covid primerov med polno cepljenimi manj kot 4%.
Kdaj bo država ugotovila, da je potrebno iz PCT pogoja nujno odstraniti pogoj C (cepljeni) in tudi zanje zahtevati obvezno testiranje na vsakih 48 ur za obisk notranjih prostorov, če že vstrajajo na tem pogoju pri necepljenih? Sicer pa NIJZ podatki kažejo, da je tovrstna sprememba nujna, če želimo omejiti nove Covid primere.

Prav tako, kdaj bo država priznala test prisotnosti Covid protiteles, kot dokazilo, da ja oseba v peteklosti že prebolela Covid (morda asimptomatsko) in ima zato naravno imunost? V Avstriji ga priznavajo že zelo dolgo....

*

https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/08/exclusive-80-percent-of-covid-19-deaths-in-august-were-people-who-had-been-vaccinated/

https://www.logicno.com/politika/60-starijih-od-50-godina-koji-umru-od-covid-19-dvostruko-su-vaksirani.html

Do sredine avgusta, 59 % ozbiljnih slučajeva u Izraelu bilo je i među onima koji su primili dvije doze vakcine COVID-19, preslikavajući podatke iz Velike Britanije.

Samo u kategoriji 50 i mlađi većina, 74 %, britanskih pacijenata sa COVIDOM-19 nije bila vakcinisana. Oni koji tvrde da smo u pandemiji nevakcinisanih ne uspjevaju da naprave razliku između starosnih grupa.

Isto se odnosi i na smrt od COVIDA-19 u Velikoj Britaniji. Nevakcinisani čine većinu smrtnih slučajeva samo u starosnoj grupi ispod 50 godina. U grupi starijoj od 50 godina, velika većina, 70 %, je djelimično ili potpuno „vakcinisana“

Ne možemo se osloniti na podatke Sjedinjenih Država da bismo dobili jasnu predstavu o tome kako funkcionišu vakcine protiv COVIDA-19, jer su CDC odlučile da prate samo revolucionarne slučajeve koji rezultiraju hospitalizacijom i/ili smrću.

Ponovna analiza podataka o ispitivanjima Pfizer, Moderna i Janssen COVID-19 vakcina pomoću odgovarajuće krajnje tačke pokazuje da vakcine štete zdravlju stanovništva, a ako se nastavi masovna vakcinacija suočavamo se sa „opasnom zdravstvenom katastrofom izazvanom vakcinom“

Nova studija pokazuje da vakcinisane osobe imaju do 13 puta veće šanse da se zaraze novom varijantom Delta nego nevakcinisane osobe koje su imale prirodnu infekciju COVID-19.

Trenutno se često ponavlja refren da smo u „pandemiji nevakcinisanih“, što znači da oni koji nisu primili vakcinu COVID-19 čine većinu onih koji su hospitalizovani i umiru od varijante Delta. Na primjer, 20. avgusta 2021. godine, glavni engleski profesor medicine, Chris Whitty, napisao je na Twitteru:

„Četiri nedjelje rada na odjeljenju protiv COVIDA-19pokazuju jasnu realnost da većina naših hospitalizovanih pacijenata sa COVIDOM-19 nije vakcinisana i žali zbog kašnjenja. Neki su veoma bolesni, uključujući i mlade odrasle osobe. Molimo vas da ne odlažete vakcinu.”

Zanimljivo je da ako odvojite vrijeme da zaista pogledate podatke, vidjet ćete da je ovo opšte mišljenje prilično varljivo. Evo grafike objavljene u Evening Standard, izvor iz Public Health England:

Kao što vidite, od 15. avgusta 2021. godine 58 % pacijenata sa COVIDOM-19 primljenih u bolnicu starijih od 50 godina je zapravo primilo dvije doze vakcine protiv COVIDA-19, a 10 % je primilo jednu dozu. Dakle, djelimično ili potpuno „vakcinisani“ pojedinci činili su 68 % hospitalizacija.

Samo u kategoriji 50 i mlađi, većina, 74 %, bila je hospitalizacija među nevakcinisanim. Whitty je, međutim, potpuno zanemario razliku između starosnih grupa. Isto se odnosi i na smrt. Nevakcinisani čine samo većinu smrtnih slučajeva od COVIDA-19 u starosnoj grupi ispod 50 godina. U grupi starijoj od 50 godina, velika većina, 70 %, je djelimično ili potpuno „vakcinisana“.

Takođe nije jasno da li bolnice u Velikoj Britaniji (i drugdje) i dalje označavaju svakoga ko je primljen i pozitivan na PCR testu kao „pacijenta sa COVIDOM-19“. U tom slučaju, ljudi sa slomljenim kostima ili bilo kojim drugim zdravstvenim problemima koji uopšte nemaju simptome COVID-19 mogli bi biti nepravedno uvršteni u ukupan broj „nevakcinisanih pacijenata sa COVID-19“.

IZRAELSKI PODACI POKAZUJU DA COVID VAKCINE NE DJELUJU KOD STARIJIH OD 50 GODINA

U Izraelu, gdje je upotreba vakcine bila veoma velika zbog ograničenja slobode za one koji se ne vakcinišu, podaci pokazuju da je kod onih koji su primili vakcinu COVID-19 6,72 puta veća vjerovatnoća da će se zaraziti nego kod ljudi sa prirodnim imunitetom.

Potpuno „vakcinisani“ takođe su činili većinu ozbiljnih slučajeva i smrtnih slučajeva povezanih sa COVIDOM-19 u julu 2021. godine, kao što je prikazano na donjim grafikonima.

Crvena boja su nevakcinisani, žuta se odnosi na djelimično „vakcinisane“, a zelena potpuno „vakcinisane“ sa dvije doze . Do sredine avgusta 59 % ozbiljnih slučajeva bilo je među onima koji su primili dvije vakcine COVID-19, preslikavajući podatke koji dolaze iz Velike Britanije.

U naučnom članku od 16. avgusta 2021. godine citiran je izraelski ministar zdravlja Nitzan Horowitz koji je rekao da je nacija ušla u „kritično vrijeme“ u trci protiv pandemije. Horowitz je navodno dobio treću dozu 13. avgusta 2021. godine, na dan kada su počeli da nude treću dozu ljudima starijim od 50 godina.

Iz podataka javnog zdravstva Engleske čini se jasnim da vakcine protiv virusa COVID-19 ne štite ljude starije od 50 godina u Velikoj Britaniji, pa je vjerovatno samo pitanje vremena kada će i tamo biti uvedene dodatne doze vakcine. I pod uslovom da su vakcine protiv COVIDA-19 iste bez obzira na zemlju, postoje svi razlozi za pretpostavku da će se isti trendovi pojaviti u drugim zemljama, uključujući SAD.

Ovo je upravo ono što je Ran Balicer, glavni direktor za inovacije u Clalit Health Servicesu, najvećoj izraelskoj organizaciji za održavanje zdravlja (HMO), rekao za Science: „Ako se to može dogoditi ovdje, vjerovatno se može dogoditi svuda.“

IZRAELSKI PODACI SMATRANI NAJBOLJIM

Podatke koji dolaze iz Izraela mnogi smatraju najboljima koje imamo i mogu nam dati uvid u to šta možemo očekivati na drugim mjestima. Kako objašnjava časopis Science:

„Izrael se sada pomno posmatra jer je bio jedna od prvih zemalja koja je uvela vakcinaciju u decembru 2020. godine i brzo je postigla stepen pokrivenosti stanovništva na kojem su im neko vrijeme zavidjele druge države.

Nacija od 9,3 miliona ljudi takođe ima robusnu javnu zdravstvenu infrastrukturu i populaciju koja je u potpunosti upisana u HMO koji ih pomno prate, omogućavajući joj da prikupi visokokvalitetne podatke iz stvarnog svijeta o tome koliko dobro funkcionišu vakcine.

„Gledam izraelske podatke veoma, veoma pažljivo jer su to neki od apsolutno najboljih podataka koji su prikupljeni bilo gdje u svijetu“, kaže David O’Connor, stručnjak za sekvenciranje virusa na Univerzitetu Wisconsin, Madison.

„Izrael je model“, slaže se Eric Topol, ljekar-naučnik iz Scripps Research. „Radi se o čistim mRNA vakcinama. Radi se o ranom početku. Tako je veoma visok nivo vakcinisane populacije. To je radna eksperimentalna laboratorija iz koje možemo da učimo.“

Izraelske HMO prate demografiju, komorbiditete i mnoštvo pokazatelja koronavirusa o infekcijama, bolestima i smrtima. “Imamo bogate podatke na individualnom nivou koji nam omogućavaju da pružimo dokaze iz stvarnog svijeta u skoro realnom vremenu”, kaže Balicer.

Efekti opadanja imuniteta možda počinju da se pokazuju kod Izraelaca vakcinisanih početkom zime; preprint objavljen prošlog mjeseca otkrio je da je zaštita od infekcije COVID-19 tokom juna i jula opala srazmjerno vremenskom periodu proteklom od vakcinacije pojedinca. Ljudi vakcinisani u januaru imali su 2,26 puta veći rizik za probojnu infekciju od onih vakcinisanih u aprilu.”

GDE ĆE SE TO ZAVRŠITI?

Prema časopisu Science, slučajevi proboja se sada množe velikom brzinom. „Postoji toliko prodornih infekcija koje dominiraju i većina hospitalizovanih pacijenata je zapravo vakcinisana“, rekao je za Science Uri Shalit, bioinformatičar sa Izraelskog tehnološkog instituta.

Skoro 1 milion Izraelaca starijih od 50 godina sada je primilo trećudozu Pfizerove mRNA vakcine. Vrijeme će pokazati da li će to pogoršati stopu probojnih slučajeva ili ga ukrotiti.

Dvir Aran, naučnik za biomedicinske podatke na Izraelskom tehnološkom institutu, ne daje puno nade, rekavši za Science da je porast već toliko strm, „čak i ako imate dvije trećine od onih preko 60 godina (koji su primili treću dozu), to će nam samo dati još nedjelju dana, možda dvije nedjelje dok nam bolnice ponovo ne budu prepune”.

Očigledno pitanje je, šta onda?! Da li će odgovor biti četvrta doza prije nego što se godina završi? Da li ćemo imati kvartalne vakcine? Mjesečne vakcine? Dvonedjeljne? Nedjeljne? Gdje i kada to završava? Prilično je lako predvidjeti da se ovo može završiti samo loše.

SAD PRATE SAMO DJELIĆ PROBOJNIH INFEKCIJA

Nažalost, ne možemo se osloniti na američke podatke da bismo dobili jasnu predstavu o tome kako funkcionišu vakcine protiv COVIDA-19, jer su američki Centri za kontrolu i prevenciju bolesti odlučili da ne prate sve revolucionarne slučajeve. Kako izvještava Pro Publica, 1. maja 2021. godine, CDC su prestali da prate i prijavljuju sve probojne slučajeve, odlučivši se da evidentiraju samo one koji rezultiraju hospitalizacijom i/ili smrću.

Kao što je napomenuto u članku, ova iracionalna odluka „ostavila je naciju u zbunjujućem razumjevanju uticaja COVIDA-19 na vakcinisane“. Takođe nas sprječava da shvatimo kako se varijante šire i da li oni koji su primili vakcinu i dalje mogu razviti takozvani „sindrom dugog transporta“.

Pojedine države takođe postavljaju sopstvene kriterijume za prikupljanje podataka o revolucionarnim slučajevima, a to još više zamućuje vode. Uprkos ovim ograničenjima, ono malo podataka koje imamo počinje da odražava podatke o Izraelu i Velikoj Britaniji.

18. avgusta 2021. CDC su objavili tri izvještaja koji pokazuju da zaštita koju dobijate od vakcine protiv COVID-19 brzo opada.

„Među stanovnicima staračkih domova, jedna od studija pokazala je da je efikasnost vakcine pala sa 74,7 % u proljeće na samo 53,1 % sredinom ljeta“, piše Pro Publica. „Slično, drugi izvještaj je otkrio da je ukupna efikasnost među vakcinisanim odraslim građanima New Yorka pala sa 91,7 % na nešto manje od 80 % između maja i jula.

Nova otkrića navela su Bidenovu administraciju da u srijedu objavi da će ljudima koji su primili vakcinu Moderna ili Pfizer biti ponuđena treća doza osam mjeseci nakon druge doze. Planirano je da program počne 20. septembra, ali mu je potrebno odobrenje Uprave za hranu i lijekove i savjetodavnog odbora CDC.

Ovaj najnoviji razvoj neki vide kao još jedan primjer promjenjivog mišljenja u javnom zdravstvu i nazadovanja koje je pratilo svaku fazu pandemije u 19 mjeseci kroz dvije uprave. Prije nešto više od mjesec dana, CDC i FDA objavili su zajedničko saopštenje u kojem se kaže da onima koji su u potpunosti vakcinisani „u ovom trenutku nije potrebna treća doza“

CDC su pratili sve probojne slučajeve do kraja aprila, a zatim su naglo prestali bez zvaničnog saopštenja. Referenca na promjenu smjernica pojavila se na veb stranici agencije u maju otprilike na polovini početne stranice.

„Bila sam šokirana“, rekla je dr Leana Wen, ljekarka i gostujuća profesorica zdravstvene politike i menadžmenta na Univerzitetu George Washington. „Još nisam čula koherentno objašnjenje zašto su prestali da prate ove informacije“

Senator Edward Markey (D-Mass.) zabrinuo se nakon izbijanja epidemije u Provincetownu i 22. jula je pisao direktorici CDC dr. Rochelle Valenski, dovodeći u pitanje odluku o ograničavanju istrage probojnih slučajeva. Pitao je koja vrsta podataka se prikuplja i kako će se javno dijeliti. Markey je zatražio od agencije da odgovori do 12. avgusta. Do sada senator nije dobio odgovor. ”

VAKCINISANI IMAJU DO 13 PUTA VEĆE ŠANSE DA DOBIJU DELTA VARIJANTU

Iako su SAD oštre u bilježenju prodornih infekcija, istraživači u Izraelu imaju neke udarne vijesti: oni su pratili, a njihove studije pokazuju da je kod vakcinisanih pojedinaca do 13 puta veća vjerovatnoća da dobiju Delta varijantu COVID-19 od onih koji nisu vakcinisani, ali su se oporavili od infekcije COVID-19.

Kako je objasnio Science Mag: Studija je „otkrila u dvije analize da su ljudi koji su bili vakcinisani u januaru i februaru u junu, julu i prvoj polovini avgusta imali šest do 13 puta veću vjerovatnoću da će se zaraziti nego nevakcinisani ljudi koji su prethodno bili prirodno zaraženi koronavirusom. U jednoj analizi, upoređujući više od 32.000 ljudi u zdravstvenom sistemu, rizik od razvoja simptomatskog COVIDA-19 bio je 27 puta veći među vakcinisanima, a rizik od hospitalizacije osam puta veći.

Studija je takođe rekla da, iako se činilo da su vakcinisane osobe koje su takođe imale prirodnu infekciju imale dodatnu zaštitu od varijante Delta, vakcinisani su i dalje u većem riziku za hospitalizacije povezane sa COVIDOM-19 u poređenju sa onima koji nisu vakcinisani, ali su prethodno bili zaraženi. Vakcinisani koji nisu imali prirodnu infekciju takođe su imali 5,96 puta veći rizik od probojne infekcije i 7,13 puta veći rizik od simptomatske bolesti.

Ovdje treba napomenuti da je ovo važno: ova studija ne kaže da vas vakcina štiti ako ste imali prirodnu infekciju; nego kaže da prirodna zaštita pomaže jačanju vakcine. U svakom slučaju, čak i ako imate prirodnu infekciju u kombinaciji sa vakcinacijom, vakcinisani su i dalje pod povećanim rizikom za probojnu infekciju.

„Ova studija je pokazala da prirodni imunitet pruža dugotrajniju i jaču zaštitu od infekcija, simptomatskih bolesti i hospitalizacije uzrokovane Delta varijantom SARS-CoV-2, u poređenju sa imunitetom izazvanim vakcinom BNT162b2 sa dvije doze“, zaključili su autori studije.

POTPUNO VAKCINISANI GOVORE

Vratimo se u Ameriku, u članku od 24. avgusta 2021. godine, Defender navodi podatke iz sedam država (Kalifornija, Kolorado, Masačusets, Oregon, Juta, Vermont i Virdžinija) koji vode detaljnije zapise od većine. U šest od ovih država, probojne infekcije činile su 18 % do 28 % svih novih dijagnoza COVID-19 u posljednjih nekoliko nedelja, kao i 12 % do 24 % svih hospitalizacija povezanih sa COVIDOM-19.

U Los Anđelesu, slučajevi proboja porasli su sa 5 % u aprilu i 13 % u julu na sadašnjih 30 %. Potpuno vakcinisane slavne ličnosti i izabrani zvaničnici sada su počeli da govore nakon što su dobili COVID–19. Kako prenosi The Defender:

„Melisa Joan Hart, bivša zvijezda ‘Sabrina tinejdžerska vještica’ je ‘stvarno ljuta’ jer ima revolucionaran slučaj. Hart je 19. avgusta podijelila na Instagramu: „Imam COVID–19. Vakcinisana sam. I dobila sam COVID–19. I loše sam. Teško mi je u grudima, teško je disati.“

Slavna ličnost Hilary Duff otkrila je da je imala COVID–19 na Instagramu 20. avgusta. Duff je rekla da ima jaku glavobolju, težinu u mozgu, pritisak u sinusima i gubitak ukusa i mirisa uprkos vakcinaciji.

Pjevač grupe Slipknot Corey Taylor (47) bio je shrvan nakon pozitivnog testa na COVID–19 i bio je primoran da otkaže svoj predstojeći nastup na konvenciji pop kulture u Mičigenu ovog vikenda, izvijestio je Rolling Stone. „Volio bih da imam bolje vijesti“, rekao je Taylor u snimljenoj video poruci prošle nedjelje na Facebooku. „Danas sam se probudio i bio pozitivan na testu i veoma sam, jako sam bolestan“…

Sveštenik Jesse Jackson i njegova supruga Jacqueline ostali su pod nadzorom ljekara u ponedjeljak (23. avgusta 2021.) u bolnici u Čikagu nakon što su dobili COVID–19 – Jackson, čikaški lider za ljudska prava, bio je potpuno vakcinisan i primio prvu dozu u januaru tokom događaja kome je dat publicitet jer je apelovao na druge da prime vakcinu što je prije moguće.

Tri američka senatora – John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.), Angus King (I-Maine) i Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) – najavili su 19. avgusta da su pozitivni na COVID–19 uprkos tome što su bili potpuno vakcinisani, prenio je CBS News.

Vijest je stigla nekoliko dana nakon što je guverner Teksasa Greg Abbott, koji je takođe bio potpuno vakcinisan, pozitivan na COVID–19. Senator države Illinois, Dan McConchie, najavio je 21. avgusta da je imao „revolucionaran“ slučaj COVID-19.

CDC JE TAKOĐE SKRIVAO SLUČAJEVE PROBOJA NA DRUGE NAČINE

CDC je takođe na druge načine modifikovao knjige o probojnim slučajevima COVID-19. Prvobitno, laboratorije koje CDCpreporučuju koristile su CT od 40 pri testiranju na SARS-CoV-2 infekciju. Uprkos korištenju CT iznad 35, poznato je da ovo stvara lažno pozitivnu stopu od 97 %. Korištenjem pretjeranog CT smatralo se da su zdravi ljudi inficirani COVIDOM-19.

U maju 2021. godine CDC su smanjili CT sa 40 na 28 ili niži – ali samo kada se radi PCR testiranje na pojedincima koji su primili vakcinu protiv COVIDA–19. Nevakcinisani su i dalje testirani pomoću CT od 40. Krajnji rezultat je očigledan: “Vakcinisane” osobe su imale manju vjerovatnoću da budu pozitivne na infekciju SARS-CoV-2, dok su nevakcinisane i dalje imale izuzetno pozitivne rezultate. Kako je primjetio Off-Guardian:

„Ovo je politika osmišljena da kontinuirano naduvava jedan broj, a sistematski minimizira drugi. Šta je to ako nije očigledan i namjeran čin prevare?”

KAKO JE CDC IZMISLIO PRIČU „PANDEMIJA NEVAKCINISANIH“

CDC su se takođe poigrali brzo i labavo sa podacima kada su izmislili priču o „pandemiji nevakcinisanih“, kojom smo trenutno indoktrinirani. Na brifingu za novinare Bijele kuće 16. jula 2021. godine, direktorka CDC dr Rochelle Valenski izjavila je da je „preko 97 % ljudi koji trenutno dolaze u bolnicu nevakcinisano“.

„Na osnovu ovih podataka, samo je izvjesno da masovna imunizacija protiv COVIDA-19 šteti zdravlju stanovništva uopšte. Naučni principi nalažu da se masovna imunizacija vakcinama protiv COVIDA-19 mora odmah obustaviti jer se suočavamo sa opasnom javnozdravstvenom katastrofom izazvanom vakcinom.“ ~ Dr Bart Classen, Trendovi interne medicine.

Ispostavilo se da se ta statistika zasniva na podacima o hospitalizaciji od januara do juna 2021. godine, kada većina Amerikanaca još nije dobila vakcinuprotiv COVIDA-19. 1. januara 2021. godine samo 0,5 % američkog stanovništva primilo je vakcinu protiv COVIDA-19. Do sredine aprila, procjenjuje se da je 31 % primilo jednu ili više doza, a do 30. juna samo 46,9 % je bilo „potpuno vakcinisano“.

VAKCINE PROTIV COVIDA-19 „DOKAZANO NANOSE VIŠE ŠTETE NEGO KORISTI“

Iako je zvanična priča da su vakcine protiv COVIDA-19 možda „manje nego savršene“, ali su ipak bolje od alternative (tj. dobijanje infekcije kada niste vakcinisani), dr Bart Classen je objavio studiju u izdanju časopisa Trends u avgustu 2021. interne medicine, osporavajući ovu tvrdnju.

Studija „Dokazano je da vakcine protiv COVIDA-19 u SAD nanose više štete nego koristi na osnovu ključnih podataka kliničkog ispitivanja koji su analizirani pomoću odgovarajuće naučne tačke ‘Svi uzrokuju ozbiljan morbiditet’“, detaljno opisuje suštinski problem u ispitivanjima Pfizer, Moderna i Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) vakcina.

Sve tri koriste surogat primarnu ciljnu tačku za zdravlje, naime „teške infekcije COVID-19“. To se, kaže Classen, „pokazalo opasno zavaravajućim“, a mnoga područja medicine prestala su da koriste krajnje tačke specifične za bolest u kliničkim ispitivanjima i umjesto toga su usvojila „mortalitet i morbiditet svih uzroka“.

Razlog za to je što ako osoba umre od liječenja ili se njime ozbiljno povrijedi, čak i ako je liječenje pomoglo u blokiranju progresije bolesti od koje se liječi, krajnji rezultat je i dalje negativan.

Da biste ponudili ekstremni primjer šta možete učiniti sa krajnjom tačkom specifičnom za bolest, mogli biste da tvrdite da je upucavanje ljudi u glavu lijek za rak, jer niko ko je dobio lijek – ko je upucan u glavu – nije umro od raka.

Prilikom ponovne analize podataka kliničkih ispitivanja ovih vakcina protiv COVIDA-19 koji su koristili „ozbiljan morbiditet svih uzroka“ kao primarnu krajnju tačku, podaci otkrivaju da vakcine zapravo nanose daleko više štete nego koristi.

Odgovarajući krajnji rezultat izračunat je zbrajanjem svih teških događaja prijavljenih u ispitivanjima, ne samo COVIDA-19, već i svih drugih ozbiljnih neželjenih događaja. Radeći ovo, teška infekcija COVID-19 dobija istu težinu kao i drugi neželjeni efekti iste težine. Prema Classenu:

„Rezultati dokazuju da nijedna od vakcina ne donosi zdravstvene beneficije, a sva ključna ispitivanja pokazuju statistički značajno povećanje „svih uzroka teškog morbiditeta“ u vakcinisanoj grupi u odnosu na placebo grupu.

Imunizovana grupa Moderna vakcinom pretrpjela je 3,042 teže posljedice od kontrolne grupe. Podaci kompanije Pfizer bili su krajnje nepotpuni, ali su dostavljeni podaci pokazali da je grupa za vakcinaciju pretrpela 90 ozbiljnijih posljedica od kontrolne grupe, kada je uključivala samo „neželjene“ negativne posljedice.

Janssenova imunizovana grupa pretrpela je 264 ozbiljnije posljedice od kontrolne grupe. Ovi nalazi su u suprotnosti sa neprikladnim surogatnim izjavama proizvođača:

Janssen tvrdi da njihova vakcina sprječava 6 slučajeva ozbiljnog COVIDA-19 koji zahtjevaju medicinsku pomoć od 19.630 vakcinisanih; Pfizer tvrdi da njihova vakcina sprječava 8 slučajeva ozbiljnog COVIDA-19 od 21.720 vakcinisanih; Moderna tvrdi da njena vakcina sprječava 30 slučajeva ozbiljnog COVIDA-19 od 15.210 vakcinisanih.

Na osnovu ovih podataka, samo je izvjesno da masovna imunizacija protiv COVIDA-19 šteti zdravlju stanovništva uopšte. Naučni principi nalažu da se masovna imunizacija vakcinama protiv COVIDA-19 mora odmah obustaviti jer se suočavamo sa opasnom javnozdravstvenom katastrofom izazvanom vakcinom.

Da bi gornji brojevi bili jasniji i očigledniji, evo statističkih podataka o prevenciji u procentima:

  • Pfizer 0,00036 %
  • Moderna 0,00125 %
  • Janssen 0,00030 %

KUDA IDEMO DALJE?

Ako ste već dobili jednu ili dvijedoze, ne možete ništa učiniti o tom pitanju. Čini se prilično očiglednim, međutim, ako objektivno analizirate podatke, najbolje je reći ne svim ali svim budućim dozama, jer svaka dodatna doza može povećati štetu i povećati rizik od ozbiljnih nuspojava.

Ako razvijete simptome infekcije SARS-CoV-2, postoji nekoliko protokola liječenja koji su se pokazali efikasnim. Opcije uključuju Zelenko protokol, MATH+protokol i raspršeni vodonik-peroksid, kako je detaljno opisano u dokumentu dr Davida Brownsteina i besplatnoj e-knjizi dr Thomasa Levyja, „Rapid Virus Recovery“.

Koji god protokol liječenja da koristite, pobrinite se da započnete liječenje što je prije moguće, idealno je pri prvom pojavljivanju simptoma. Takođe, imajte na umu da ako ste dobili jednu ili više doza vakcine protiv COVIDA-19, rizik od teške infekcije mogao bi zapravo biti veći, a ne manji, nego da niste dobili vakcinu. Ovo se čini naročito istinitim ako imate više od 50 godina. Dakle, ne odlažite liječenje ako razvijete simptome.

Autor: Dr. Joseph Mercola

*

V DSO zboleli cepljeni: https://novice.svet24.si/clanek/novice/slovenija/613b32ee6dae4/cim-prej-nijz-se-spreneveda-in-se-isce-gresnega-kozla-ampak-jaz-ne-bom-tiho-zarja-st35-str-10?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR3UP6Kkp_0H2y9PbAR9raeZuRX14WSdlX-macSzolooq4NNqFMB64nJDUI#Echobox=1631300189

Ana Petrič je tista direktorica centra za starejše, ki svoje delo vidi kot poslanstvo. Za stanovalce centra v Notranjih Goricah skrbi kot za svoje dedke in babice, zato, da bi ti ljudje kljub koronavirusu živeli čim bolj normalno: »Da bi živeli in ne životarili,« kot rada reče.

V prvem valu v njihovem centru ni zbolel nihče. V drugem je okužbo prinesla hči stanovalke. V tretjem spet ni zbolel nihče, zdaj, v četrtem valu, pa so zboleli polno cepljeni … V medijih je završalo, da domove za ostarele spet zapirajo. NIJZ pravi, da popolno zaprtje ni potrebno, če so stanovalci cepljeni in brez znakov bolezni. A prav cepljeni in brez znakov bolezni so bili okuženi v centru v Notranjih Goricah. Kaj se dogaja?

V prvem valu korone niste imeli nobene okužbe, kajne?

Tako je, nobene. V drugem valu je stanovalko okužila hči, ki ni vedela, da ima covid, in v stiku z mamo ni upoštevala osnovnih priporočil za prenos in širjenje. Stanovalka je okužila še nekaj sostanovalcev, s katerimi je bila v stiku, vendar smo okužbo zajezili. V tretjem valu nismo imeli okužbe in zdaj je tu četrti val, ki je marsikaj postavil pod vprašaj.

Pod vprašaj, ker je zdaj okužbo prinesla cepljena gospa? Kaj se je zgodilo?

Ena od stanovalk je potarnala, da se ne počuti dobro in da misli, da je bolna. Diplomirana medicinska sestra je takoj opravila bris in test je bil pozitiven. Ker je bila gospa aktivna in se je družila z večjim številom stanovalcev, smo testirali njene stike. Potem je začela stanovalka v sosednji stavbi tarnati, da je hrana zanič, ker že sedem dni nima okusa. Po testiranju smo ugotovili, da je bila gospa brez okusa in vonja pravzaprav prva okužena in je na telovadbi prenesla okužbo naprej, bolela jo je le glava, vendar nikomur ni povedala in se je zdravila sama z lekadolom. Skupno je zbolelo enajst stanovalcev, deset polno cepljenih in en necepljen. Nemudoma smo testirali tudi vse zaposlene in vsi so bili negativni. Gospa, ki je zbolela, je pogosto hodila izven centra in tudi sama ni vedela, od koga bi se lahko nalezla. Takoj po tem, ko smo vse odkrili, smo uredili cone in vse odpravili v 19 dneh. Zdaj smo v redu. Danes smo vsi negativni in spet vse poteka normalno.

Kaj ste naredili potem?

Po conah (bela, siva, rdeča) smo uredili še čiste in nečiste filtre, začeli uporabljati polno zaščitno opremo, reorganizirali delo in delovne time, obvestili koordinatorko za covid, epidemiološko službo NIJZ, seznanili stanovalce, uredili vse podrobnosti, da bi preprečili širjenje, napisali obvestila, obvestili svojce. Okužba v domu zahteva takojšen odziv, oceno stanja, iskanje vira in popolno prilagoditev na novo situacijo. Hkrati pa je treba poskrbeti za vse velike in male zahteve ter želje stanovalcev, da so z dogajanjem čim manj obremenjeni.

Koliko je precepljenih starostnikov v domu in kako to, da so zboleli?

V centru je polno cepljenih 98 odstotkov stanovalcev. V našem primeru smo ugotovili, da cepljeni konec decembra s prvim odmerkom in januarja z drugim očitno nimajo več dovolj protiteles. Miselnost pa je ravno obratna. Ker so cepljeni, mislijo, da ne morejo zboleti, in ne upoštevajo osnovnih ukrepov. Enako razmišlja tudi večina njihovih svojcev. Saj so cepljeni, pravijo, in zaščiteni. Vendar to ne drži povsem. Kot tudi ne drži, da je potek bolezni lažji. To, žal, ne velja za vse. 

Kako se zaposleni držite pravil in kaj priporočate starostnikom, kako jih nadzorujete; je to sploh humano?

Zaposleni se držimo pravil, ker točno vemo, kaj se zgodi, če zboli nekdo od stanovalcev, kolikšna odgovornost je to in kaj vse okužba potegne za seboj. Po centru imamo na vsakem koraku izobešena navodila, opomnike za razkuževanje, umivanje rok, zračenje, upoštevanje drugih priporočil. Vsi zaposleni smo glede okužb opravili več izobraževanj. Za stanovalce smo organizirali informativne sestanke in jih seznanili z novostmi. Iskreno povedano, stanovalcev ali obiskov ne moreš v celoti nadzorovati, ker morajo imeti zasebnost. Vemo, da veliko svojcev v sobi, ko so sami s stanovalcem, ne uporablja zaščitne maske. Prepričani so, da so zdravi. Mi jih prijazno lepo prosimo, naj upoštevajo osnove, vendar vsak vidi samo svojega svojca in ne 209 preostalih stanovalcev ter vseh zaposlenih in svojcev, ki bodo zaradi neobzirnosti in neodgovornosti na škodi.

Ali je kakšen zaposleni pri vas že prenesel korono na varovance?

Ne, nihče. Četudi se rado poroča, da so največji vir prenosa zaposleni. Ampak javnost verjetno ne ve, da se v statistiko vpisuje vse zaposlene, tudi tiste, ki so zboleli na dopustu, bolniški ali bili odsotni z dela in niso imeli s stanovalci nobene povezave. Dobro vprašanje bi bilo tudi, koliko zaposlenih so okužili stanovalci, ki ne uporabljajo zaščitne maske in ne izvajajo osnovnih ukrepov, v nasprotju z zaposlenimi. Dejstvo pa je, da gre v vseh primerih za nenamerno okuževanje ter obsojanje in iskanje krivca ni na mestu.

Kaj so rekli na NIJZ, ko ste sporočili, da so vaši cepljeni stanovalci okuženi?

Ob poročanju je epidemiologinja namestniku glavne sestre rekla, naj se center zapre do razjasnitve epidemiološke slike. Potem smo organizirali obiske in izhode po conah. Ker smo eden prvih primerov, da so zboleli cepljeni stanovalci, ni jasnih pisnih navodil. Veljajo samo smernice, da polno cepljeni stanovalci ne potrebujejo izolacije kljub tveganim stikom.

V našem primeru pa se je jasno pokazalo, da če ne bi ravnali tako, kot smo, bi sedaj lahko zagotovo govorili o bistveno večji številki okuženih, kot smo jo imeli. Glede na to, da so bili tvegani stiki v sivi coni in se je pritožil le eden izmed svojcev, ki nikakor ni hotel razumeti in je sklical vse medije, se zdaj tudi NIJZ spreneveda in se išče grešnega kozla. Ampak jaz ne bom tiho. Kdo bi odgovarjal v primeru večje številke okuženih stanovalcev in zaposlenih? Kdo bi bil odgovoren za posledice? NIJZ? Ne, odgovarjala bi jaz. In nikar naj se ne govori o lažjem poteku bolezni, testiranju, cepljenju in misli, da je s tem vse rešeno, ker ni. Kaj pomaga PCT, če osebno poznam primere, ki so v obdobju pol leta že drugič okuženi s covidom? Cepljeni lahko zbolevajo in prenašajo. Test pa v resnici velja tisti trenutek, ko ga opraviš, ob naslednjem stiku pa se že lahko nevede okužiš. Mogoče pomaga zmanjšati tveganje, ga pa v celoti ne odpravi. 

Kaj predlagate, kako naj ravnajo cepljeni, necepljeni, in kako se vaš dom pripravlja na četrti val?

Cepljeni ali necepljeni naj upoštevajo osnove. Naj ne mislijo, da so kljub cepljenju popolnoma zaščiteni. Če se bomo vsi držali osnov, ne bo nobenih omejitev, nobenih con, nobene slabe volje in nezadovoljstva. Vsem je že jasno, da se bomo s takšnim stanjem ukvarjali še nekaj časa, in ob tako visokih številkah se bo dogajalo samo dvoje – ali se bomo večkrat cepili in tako poskrbeli za zadostno količino protiteles ali pa bomo večkrat preboleli in sčasoma postali imuni.

Obiski so izredno pomembni. Zato smo jih pri nas imeli kljub okužbam. Potekali so različno, po conah, kar pomeni, da so svojci dobili vso ustrezno zaščitno opremo. Tako bo tudi v prihodnje. Še naprej bomo ravnali po navodilu oziroma v sodelovanju s strokovnjaki in skladno s kriznim načrtom. Iskreno pa si želim malo več strpnosti in razumevanja ter manj obsojanja, najlažje je namreč modrovati od daleč. V prvih vrstah pa delujejo ljudje, ki bi jih moralo že več let biti veliko več in tudi plačani bi morali biti bolj pošteno. Svojim sodelavkam in sodelavcem sem lahko samo hvaležna, da so zdržali ta napor.

Vem, da smo naredili vse in da so nam stanovalci hvaležni. Dnevno nam to povedo. In to v resnici šteje.

*

The proportion of vaccinated people requiring treatment in hospital has been increasing over recent months, as the number of vaccinated people in the wider population has risen.

Vaccination has drastically reduced the overall number of infections and reduced the severity of infections where they occur. However, the number of breakthrough infections has increased as the population of vaccinated people has grown.

At the end of August, 54 per cent of Covid-19 patients – or 168 patients – were fully vaccinated. Some 44 per cent were not fully vaccinated, and in 2 per cent of cases, the vaccination status was unknown.

Data on vaccination was available for 311 of the 323 patients then in hospital.

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/covid-54-of-hospital-patients-with-virus-are-fully-vaccinated-1.4670229?fbclid=IwAR0sTeWRN80Hz0napuwyIvpN2dG8LgBGDlMDiqmhS8_ljCMhuUgR4EKHFY4

*

Public Health Scotland has released new data showing that the vast majority of “covid” deaths in the country are occurring in people who are “fully vaccinated.”

Scots who took both doses of one of Donald “father of the vaccine” Trump’s “Operation Warp Speed” injections comprise 75 percent of all covid-related deaths, while those who took just one dose so far make up five percent.

The remaining 20 percent of deaths being blamed on covid are occurring in people who are “unvaccinated,” but who likely “caught” vaccine spike proteins that were shed on them by the “fully vaccinated.”

Mind you, there are no unvaccinated people who are going from healthy to unhealthy to death in a matter of days or even hours. This is, however, happening to people who get the shots.

https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/check-the-covid-death-chart-in-karl-denningers-new-piece/

*

Medicinska sestra iz Italije: Vsi na intenzivni negi so bili cepljeni !!! https://www.facebook.com/701694363207484/videos/132331009097932

*

https://hr.sott.net/article/30420-Slucajevi-COVID-a-padaju-u-najmanje-cijepljenim-zemljama

*

FB 22.9. 2021

*

https://www.slovenskenovice.si/novice/slovenija/znano-koliko-hospitaliziranih-je-cepljenih-in-s-katerim-cepivom/?utm_term=Autofeed&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1632198266

*

Izrael 2021, vir Ministrstvo za zdravje

*

Those ‘anomalous’ deaths

In analyses presented by Steve Kirsch to the FDA (slide #6), Kirsch summarized data showing the COVID vaccines are killing more people than they are saving — including producing six excess deaths for each life reportedly saved in nursing home residents, and five excess deaths per life saved according to Pfizer’s early clinical trial data.

Independent statisticians estimate the injections are linked to roughly 470 deaths per million doses administered. (By way of comparison, CDC researchers once conceded that smallpox vaccination was responsible for one death per million.)

In February, studies out of Israel were already showing the Pfizer shot (the only one used in Israel) was causing “mortality hundreds of times greater in young people compared to mortality from coronavirus without the vaccine, and dozens of times more in the elderly.”

Investigative journalist Corey Lynn of Corey’s Digs pointed out the CDC’s methodology for calculating COVID vaccine-related deaths is highly misleading because it is based on the number of doses administered, rather than on the number of people who receive injections.

Lynn’s analysis shows this methodology reduces the percentage of deaths almost by half, “an incredible mathematical error, surely done with intention.”

Another CDC ploy for undercounting the damage done by the COVID injections has to do with the agency’s definition of “fully vaccinated. The CDC currently considers as “unvaccinated” anyone who is not two weeks out from their second dose (in a two-dose series) or two weeks out from a single-dose vaccine. (And as Children’s Health Defense President Mary Holland recently pointed out, “unvaccinated” could “soon mean anyone who’s missing the latest booster dose,” with even more boosters likely in store down the road.)

Given that 17% of the deaths reported to VAERS have occurred within 48 hours of COVID vaccination, it is clear many U.S. vaccine deaths are being counted as “unvaccinated” deaths and misattributed to COVID-19 or other causes.

In the UK, however, public health data show that 80% of “COVID-19” deaths in August were in people who had been vaccinated, and hospitalization rates were 70% higher in the vaccinated than in the unvaccinated.

Increasingly, members of the public are not fooled by the statistical shenanigans. When a Detroit TV channel recently tried to drum up hostility against the unvaccinated by asking viewers to submit tales of recalcitrant uninjected relatives dying from COVID-19, they instead got more than 182,000 comments about loved ones who had died or been injured after receiving one or more COVID shots.

These replies provide compelling evidence that what we are now experiencing is a “pandemic of the vaccinated.”

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-health-data-mainstream-media-vaccine-risks/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=6967978e-9b90-46ff-b59d-f9e5a29a371c&fbclid=IwAR0-NFNXR8LNYpTVWry3HIp1BJ4qkQ9RM_hTxRMT_v3lRXbpAJyZeAWv3jo

*

*

Analiza podatkov iz Izraela, ZDA in Indije: več cepljenja pomeni več primerov COVID-19 na milijon ljudi: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSlW8l7UvuI

Izrael, ki je najbolj precepljen in ima tretji odmerek, ima najvišjo stopnjo primerov na svetu v celi pandemiji. 

*

I šta nije u redu s Izraelom? Jevreji bi trebali biti inteligentni. Pa ipak, Izrael nastavlja s poražavajućom politikom u odnosu na emitovanje izraelskih glavnih medija da je politika vakcinisanja potpuni promašaj. Ako je engleski prijevod vijesti tačan, od novih 279 slučajeva Covida-19 od prethodnog dana u Izraelu, 259 je “potpuno vakcinisano”. Samo 29 je bilo “nevakcinisano”. Drugim riječima, 90 % novih izraelskih slučajeva Covida-19 bili su potpuno vakcinisani ljudi.

https://www.logicno.com/politika/skandinavske-vlade-najavljuju-covid-je-gotov-izrael-najavljuje-da-vakcina-ne-stiti.html

*

https://www.facebook.com/marjana.virtnik/videos/353377356534473

Avstralija: v bolnišnicah so cepljeni

*

V DSO Logatec je okuženih 44 starostnikov, skoraj vsi so bili cepljeni: https://4d.rtvslo.si/arhiv/slovenska-kronika/174809805?fbclid=IwAR2-sPmV-5vzlNM5vfffQO2Pef60gbQce0erb3BTJNuAtU3IEFwsxhavEpE

*

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/boom-sen-ron-johnson-drops-truth-bomb-senate-floor-63-uk-delta-deaths-last-7-5-months-fully-vaccinated-video/

Sen. Ron Johnson Drops Truth-Bomb on Senate Floor – 63% of UK Delta Deaths in Last 7.5 Months Were Fully Vaccinated (VIDEO)

By Jim Hoft
Published October 2, 2021 at 7:42pm

Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) continued to drop truth bombs in the US Senate on the coronavirus pandemic and the government-certified COVID vaccines.

During his Thursday floor speech, Senator Johnson pointed out that 63% of all coronavirus Delta deaths in the last 7.5 months were fully vaccinated individuals.

*

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/study-covid-19-vaccines-increase-deaths-and-hospitalizations-from-covid-19-based-on-analysis-of-most-vaccinated-countries/

*

*
10.10. 2021
*
Latest UK data : 40-49 year-olds twice injected, are 86% more likely to test positive for COVID. 
No wonder, as we see in many places throughout the world, the more you inject, the higher the case numbers go. 
THERE IS NO LOGICAL CASE VACCINE PASSPORTS - THE MANDATES MUST END
And remember that ignorant and divisive Berejiklian that announced ‘’she wouldn’t want to be near an unvaccinated person’’. 
 
*

Taiwan death from COVID-19 vaccination exceeds death from COVID-19. Taiwan’s death toll from COVID-19 vaccination exceeds death toll from COVID-19 for the first time.

 

(Observer Network News) As of the 7th, the death toll after vaccination in Taiwan reached 852, while the death toll after the COVID-19 was diagnosed was 844. The number of deaths after vaccination exceeded the number of confirmed deaths for the first time.

 

According to a “Notice of Adverse Events after COVID-19 Vaccination” issued by Taiwan’s health department, on March 22 this year, Taiwan began vaccination. From that day to October 6, the death toll after vaccination in Taiwan has reached 849.

https://medicaltrend.org/2021/10/10/taiwan-death-from-covid-19-vaccination-exceeds-death-from-covid-19/

*

The death rate from vaccination in Taiwan is higher than the death rate from the modern virus

https://world-signals.com/news/2021/10/13/the-death-rate-from-vaccination-in-taiwan-is-higher-than-the-death-rate-from-the-modern-virus/?fbclid=IwAR0IDA2xIDDgPLRzXt7ef5wckelkacJqPAMaKJjrLHWiLCF4ISIW-Zq4fZw

*

*

https://www.malcolmrobertsqld.com.au/why-is-data-about-deaths-being-held-back/?fbclid=IwAR1jMscL5zzJHGCBUJg-NN5utjko3Rx6-0hPqo2-JqhZ_FspiKfY3TDV4sA

Transcript

Mr President as a servant to the people of Queensland and Australia I have a duty to ensure reasoned and accurate debate.

The Minister representing the Minister for Health, Senator Colbeck has that same duty, to ensure data central to reasoned and informed debate is made public.

For many years following the standardization of mortality reporting between the states mortality data has been made available 6 weeks after the period to which it relates.

The last mortality data covers the period to 30th June 2021. It is now October 18th. Suddenly and without explanation data is being held back for 15 weeks.

The Minister should have been prepared for this question, I did advise his office of the subject of my question today and also directed his office to my question on notice number 3970 asking for this same information.

QON 3970 has been outstanding for 12 weeks.

The data to June 30th shows deaths in Australia in 2021 are above the 7 year moving average and consistently above anything we have ever seen before in Australia.

It is troubling that NSW and Queensland no longer make this information public.

In the absence of Australian mortality data I will quickly reference official data from the UK, which has seen an increase in deaths amongst 15 – 17 year olds of 20% following the start of vaccination of that cohort, trending towards 25% at younger ages down to 4.

More worrying is that this distribution is not even, the mortality rate amongst boys was up 28%, and amongst girls 8%.

This may result from one of the 268 known adverse interactions between the COVID vaccines and other prescription drugs documented by the United States FDA on their website.

Logic would dictate that before giving a patient a COVID vaccine one would check to see what drugs they are already using, and what natural immunity they may have resulting from of a previous COVID infection.

I don’t think the 33 Bunnings Stores in Queensland that offered vaccinations to the general public last weekend asked for that information.

Natural antibodies were found by a very recent, gold standard paper by the University of Edinburgh to offer protection against COVID of 80%, substantially better than the vaccines are now providing.[1]

I am concerned this Parliament’s reckless vaccination crusade is killing people.

Let me pose some wider questions for the Minister to consider:

Is the well documented reduction in health and diagnostic services creating a time bomb in delayed treatment – early detection of cancer, for instance – and is that killing people?

Are widespread lockdowns creating mental health problems that result in increased loss of life?

Is locking up elderly Australians in Nursing Homes with no family contact causing elderly to let go early?

Are business owners who have seen their life work destroyed and bankrupted by capricious and counter-productive lockdowns losing their battle with life?

These are questions any prudent, caring government would be worried about. This Government and this Parliament should be watching mortality data closely, to get guidance on these matters in real time.

Sadly this Government and this Parliament is neither prudent nor caring.

Our community, our nation deserves better.

Release the data.

*

https://dokumentarac.hr/covid-19/studija-veliki-neuspjeh-za-regije-potpuno-cijepljenih-u-sad-u/?fbclid=IwAR3_x3mB9ZSpx8CDe59M80egujXr-JjdwmAAGPh8Efj9ugp703z6ogxUGLI

*

https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/21/83-percent-covid-19-deaths-among-fully-vaccinated/

*

https://hr.sott.net/article/30625-Studija-istrazivaca-sa-Harvarda-otkriva-da-zemlje-sa-najnizim-stopama-cijepljenja-imaju-manje-slucajeva-COVID-a-od-potpuno-cijepljenih-zemalja

*

Povečanje COVID-19 ni povezano s stopnjo cepljenja v 68 državah in 2947 okrožjih v ZDA

S. V. Subramanian: Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Cambridge, MA USA in Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA. Email:ude.dravrah.hpsh@marbusvs.

Akhil Kumar: Turner Fenton Secondary School, Brampton, ON Canada

Cepiva so trenutno glavna strategija boja proti COVID-19 po vsem svetu. Poročajo o stalnem porastu novih primerov v Združenih državah Amerike (ZDA), kar naj naj bi bilo posledica območij z nizko stopnjo cepljenja [1]. Podobna poročila prihajajo tudi iz držav, kot sta Nemčija in Združeno kraljestvo [2]. Hkrati so tudi v Izraelu, ki je bil hvaljen zaradi hitrega in visokega deleža cepljenja, zabeležili precejšen porast primerov COVID-19 [3]. V 68 državah in 2947 okrožjih v ZDA raziskujemo povezavo med odstotkom v celoti cepljenega prebivalstva in novimi primeri COVID-19.

Metode

Uporabili smo podatke COVID-19, ki jih je za meddržavno analizo zagotovila organizacija Our World in Data in so na voljo do 3. septembra 2021 (dodatna preglednica 1) [4]. Vključili smo 68 držav, ki so izpolnjevale naslednja merila: imele so na voljo podatke o drugem odmerku cepiva; imele so na voljo podatke o primerih COVID-19; imele so na voljo podatke o prebivalstvu; zadnja posodobitev podatkov je bila v treh dneh pred 3. septembrom 2021 ali na ta dan. Za 7 dni pred 3. septembrom 2021 smo za vsako državo izračunali število primerov COVID-19 na 1 milijon prebivalcev in odstotek prebivalstva, ki je v celoti cepljeno.

Za analizo na ravni okrožij v ZDA smo uporabili podatke skupine White House COVID-19 [5], ki so bili na voljo 2. septembra 2021 (dodatna preglednica 2). Izločili smo okrožja, ki niso poročala podatkov o odstotku v celoti cepljenega prebivalstva, tako da smo za analizo dobili 2947 okrožij. Izračunali smo število in odstotke okrožij, v katerih se je povečalo število primerov COVID-19, po ravneh odstotka popolnoma cepljenih prebivalcev v posameznem okrožju. Odstotek povečanja števila primerov COVID-19 je bil izračunan na podlagi razlike v številu primerov v zadnjih 7 dneh in 7 dneh pred njimi. Na primer, v okrožju Los Angeles v Kaliforniji je bilo v zadnjih 7 dneh (od 26. avgusta do 1. septembra) 18 171 primerov, v prejšnjih 7 dneh (od 19. do 25. avgusta) pa 31 616 primerov, zato v tem okrožju ni prišlo do povečanja števila primerov v našem podatkovnem nizu. Zagotavljamo nadzorno ploščo metrik, uporabljenih v tej analizi, ki se samodejno posodablja, ko skupina White House COVID-19 Team da na voljo nove podatke (https://tiny.cc/USDashboard).

Ugotovitve

Na ravni države se zdi, da ni opazne povezave med odstotkom v celoti cepljenega prebivalstva in novimi primeri COVID-19 v zadnjih 7 dneh (slika 1). Pravzaprav trendna črta kaže na rahlo pozitivno povezavo, tako da je v državah z višjim odstotkom popolnoma cepljenega prebivalstva več primerov COVID-19 na 1 milijon prebivalcev. Zlasti v Izraelu z več kot 60 % v celoti cepljenega prebivalstva je bilo v zadnjih 7 dneh največ primerov COVID-19 na 1 milijon prebivalcev. Pomanjkanje pomembne povezave med odstotkom popolnoma cepljenega prebivalstva in novimi primeri COVID-19 je še dodatno razvidno na primer iz primerjave Islandije in Portugalske. Obe državi imata več kot 75 % v celoti cepljenih prebivalcev in več primerov COVID-19 na 1 milijon prebivalcev kot državi, kot sta Vietnam in Južna Afrika, ki imata približno 10 % v celoti cepljenih prebivalcev.

Tudi v okrožjih ZDA je mediana novih primerov COVID-19 na 100.000 prebivalcev v zadnjih 7 dneh zelo podobna v vseh kategorijah odstotka v celoti cepljenega prebivalstva (slika 2). Opazne so tudi precejšnje razlike v novih primerih COVID-19 v okrožjih znotraj kategorij odstotka v celoti cepljenega prebivalstva. Prav tako se zdi, da ni pomembnega pokazatelja, da bi se število primerov COVID-19 zmanjševalo z višjimi odstotki v celoti cepljenega prebivalstva (slika 3).

Ameriški center za nadzor in preprečevanje bolezni (CDC) je štiri od petih okrožij z najvišjim odstotkom v celoti cepljenih prebivalcev (99,9-84,3 %) opredelil kot okrožja z visoko stopnjo prenosa. Okrožja Chattahoochee (Georgia), McKinley (Nova Mehika) in Arecibo (Portoriko) imajo več kot 90 % v celoti cepljenih prebivalcev, vsa tri okrožja pa so uvrščena med okrožja z "visoko stopnjo prenosa". Nasprotno pa ima od 57 okrožij, ki jih je CDC uvrstil med okrožja z nizko stopnjo prenosa, 26,3 % (15) okrožij odstotek v celoti cepljenih prebivalcev nižji od 20 %.

Ker naj bi popolna imunost zaradi cepiva nastala približno 2 tedna po drugem odmerku, smo opravili analize občutljivosti z uporabo enomesečnega zamika pri odstotku popolnoma cepljenega prebivalstva za države in okrožja ZDA. Zgornje ugotovitve, da ni opazne povezave med primeri COVID-19 in ravnmi popolnoma cepljenih, smo opazili tudi, ko smo upoštevali enomesečni zamik pri ravneh popolnoma cepljenih (dodatna slika 1, dodatna slika 2).

Opozoriti moramo, da gre pri podatkih o primerih COVID-19 za potrjene primere, kar je funkcija tako dejavnikov na strani ponudbe (npr. razlike v zmogljivostih testiranja ali praksah poročanja) kot na strani povpraševanja (npr. razlike v odločitvi ljudi, kdaj se bodo testirali).

Tolmačenje

Ponovno je treba preučiti izključno zanašanje na cepljenje kot glavno strategijo za ublažitev COVID-19 in njegovih škodljivih posledic, zlasti ob upoštevanju različice Delta (B.1.617.2) in verjetnosti prihodnjih različic. Morda bo treba poleg povečanja stopnje cepljenja uvesti tudi druge farmakološke in nefarmakološke ukrepe. Takšna korekcija, zlasti v zvezi s političnim opisom, je zaradi novih znanstvenih dokazov o dejanski učinkovitosti cepiv izredno pomembna.

Na primer, v poročilu, ki ga je objavilo ministrstvo za zdravje v Izraelu, je bila učinkovitost dveh odmerkov cepiva BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) pri preprečevanju okužbe s COVID-19 39-odstotna [6], kar je bistveno manj kot 96-odstotna učinkovitost v preskušanju [7]. Prav tako se kaže, da imunost, pridobljena s cepivom Pfizer-BioNTech, morda ni tako močna kot imunost, pridobljena z okrevanjem od virusa SARS CoV-2 -COVID-19 [8]. Poročali so tudi o znatnem upadu imunosti cepiv mRNA 6 mesecev po cepljenju [9]. Čeprav cepljenje posameznikom nudi zaščito pred hudimi hospitalizacijami in smrtjo, je CDC poročal o povečanju stopnje hospitalizacij oziroma smrti med popolnoma cepljenimi od 0,01 do 9 % in od 0 do 15,1 % (med januarjem in majem 2021) [10].

Skratka, čeprav si je treba prizadevati za spodbujanje prebivalstva k cepljenju, je treba to početi s ponižnostjo in spoštovanjem. Stigmatizacija prebivalstva lahko povzroči več škode kot koristi. Pomembno je, da je treba obnoviti tudi druga nefarmakološka prizadevanja za preprečevanje (npr. pomen osnovne higiene javnega zdravja glede vzdrževanja varne razdalje ali umivanja rok, spodbujanje pogostejših in cenejših oblik testiranja), da bi vzpostavili ravnovesje in se naučili živeti s COVID-19 na enak način kot 100 let kasneje z različnimi sezonskimi spremembami virusa gripe iz leta 1918.

Vir: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481107/

*

https://www.neodvisnimediji.si/neodvisni-covid-sledilnik/171-eksplozija-novih-okuzb-med-polno-zascitenimi?fbclid=IwAR2t_b2KBG7dauyWyoPZfm00yQv1aQmwdivSkrlcC8Af0urMOsT2wCO4O4E

*

KOLIKO CEPLJENIH OSEB JE V NAŠIH BOLNICAH ZARADI KOVIDA-19
Vorarlberške bolnišnice so edine bolnišnice v Avstriji, ki še vedno navajajo število cepljenih oseb. Podatki se redno posodabljajo. Do 12. oktobra 2021 je bilo Z GENSKO TERAPIJO dvakrat cepljenih 12 od 19 bolnikov, ki so se zdravili v bolnišnici. Koliko od preostalih 7 bolnikov je že PREJELO prvo cepljenje, ni navedeno. Vir: "Vorarlberger Landeskrankenhäuser" (https://www.landeskrankenhaus.at/news/lagebericht-covid-19)
Podobno velja v Avstriji za obdobje od 13. septembra do 10. oktobra. Po podatkih zdravstvene agencije AGES je bilo 60,82 % novih kovid primerov s simptomi, starejših od 60 let 2x cepljenih. Tako je bilo 2.291 Od 3.767 novih okužb je bilo 2.291 "popolnoma imunih".
Zahtevamo, da se tudi pri nas javno objavlja, koliko oseb, ki so bile ponovno sprejete v bolnico zaradi kovida, je bilo 1x, 2x ali 3x cepljenih

Zahtevamo tudi obdukcije za vsako osebo, ki je umrla zaradi kovida in je bila predhodno cepljena

*

Znanstveniki so odkrili povezavo med cepljenjem in umrljivostjo zaradi COVID-19
UMRLJIVOST BOLNIKOV SE JE PO CEPLJENJU PROTI COVID-19 POVEČALA ZA 116-238,5 %
Skupina strokovnjakov je analizirala podatke o obolevnosti in umrljivosti zaradi COVID-19 pet do osem mesecev po začetku množičnega cepljenja. Študije so zajele prebivalstvo Izraela, Velike Britanije, Francije in Rusije. Strokovnjaki so ugotovili povezavo med cepljenjem in kasnejšim povečanjem obolevnosti in umrljivosti, poroča časnik "President".
Rezultati raziskave so šokirali same strokovnjake: ob okužbi s COVID-19 po cepljenju se je stopnja umrljivosti bolnikov povečala za 116-238,5%. Strokovnjaki so imeli naravno vprašanje:
»Če množično cepljenje proti koronavirusu s sodobnimi cepivi Pfizer/BioNTech, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Sputnik V ali Gam-COVID-Vac spodbuja povečanje števila primerov in smrti zaradi te okužbe, zakaj potem ta cepiva veljajo za učinkovito zaščito pred koronavirus?"
Časovna bomba?
Raziskavo strokovnjakov je spodbudilo hitro ustvarjanje številnih cepiv proti COVID-19 po vsem svetu, kar je med njimi vzbujalo dvome. Pri cepljenju proti COVID-19 nastanejo "nepopolna" protitelesa, ki vežejo virus, vendar ga ne morejo nevtralizirati. Posledično virus ohrani sposobnost prodiranja in okužbe celic.
Prodre v makrofag, se v njem razmnožuje in razmnožuje. Makrofag, zasnovan za fagocitno zaščito telesa v imunskem sistemu T-celic, umre. To pomeni, da se okužba intenzivira, protitelesa, ki nastanejo po cepljenju, pa povečajo virusno obremenitev.
Znanstveniki so se odločili ugotoviti, ali so cepiva "časovna bomba", ko se 4-7 mesecev po cepljenju zmanjša koncentracija protiteles, ki nevtralizirajo virus.
Strahovi so se potrdili
Za študije so bili vzeti podatki za obdobje od 01.05.2021 do 22.08.2021 ter število ljudi, cepljenih proti koronavirusu od začetka cepljenja in v naslednjih treh mesecih v Izraelu, Veliki Britaniji, Franciji in Rusiji.
Izkazalo se je, da se je umrljivost v teh državah od 1. julija do 22. avgusta 2021 povečala za 116-238,5%. Stopnja umrljivosti zaradi COVID-19 se je najbolj povečala v Izraelu (kjer se je cepljenje začelo že prej), manj izrazito v Franciji, čeprav je približno enaka stopnji v Izraelu in Združenem kraljestvu. V Rusiji se je umrljivost povečala za 117,1% (cepljenje se je začelo pozneje kot v drugih državah).
Študije so pokazale, da cepljenje proti okužbi s koronavirusom s sodobnimi cepivi, kot so Pfizer / BioNTech, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Sputnik V ali Gam-COVID-Vac, prispeva k povečanju obolevnosti in umrljivosti.
Razvita cepiva pravzaprav ne ščitijo pred COVID-19 in ne razvijajo imunosti , ampak poslabšajo potek bolezni, vse do smrti. (ADE).Ta cepiva je treba izboljšati ali ustvariti nova, ki lahko aktivirajo T-celično povezavo imunosti za zanesljivo protivirusno zaščito, pravijo strokovnjaki.
Skupina strokovnjakov je vključevala:
Bocharov N.V., kandidat medicinskih znanosti, zasluženi zdravnik Ruske federacije, zdravnik svetovalec skupine podjetij TRIMM;
Laskavy V.N., doktor veterinarskih znanosti, zasluženi veterinar Ruske federacije, akademik Akademije za varnost hrane Ruske federacije.
Polyanina T.I., kandidatka bioloških znanosti, namestnica generalnega direktorja za znanost, SARBIOTECH LLC.


U jednom od najuglednijih znanstvenih časopisa na svijetu, The Lancetu, objavljeno je istraživanje u kojem je sudjelovalo 20-ak uglednih britanskih znanstvenika koje je došlo do zaključka kako cijepljeni mogu biti odgovorni za proboje zaraza SARS-CoV-2 virusom jer nose sličan viralni teret kao i zaražene osobe koje se nisu cijepile.

To istraživanje - Community transmission and viral load kinetics of the SARS-CoV-2 delta (B.1.617.2) variant in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals in the UK: a prospective, longitudinal, cohort study - potpisao je, između ostalih, i Neil M. Ferguson, čovjek koji je svojedobno gurnuo Britaniju u lockdown, i poznat je po tome da je sklon davanju izrazito pesimističnih epdimioloških prognoza.

Istraživanje je financirao britanski Nationale Institute for Health Researsch, te se nipošto ne radi o znanstvenom projektu koji na bilo koji način pokušava prikazati opasnosti pandemije manjima nego jesu ili iskriviti znanstvene činjenice. No, ključni zaključak istraživanja u svojoj suštini ipak ide u potpuno suprotnom smjeru od prevladavajuće teze u Europi prema kojima ljudima koji su cijepljeni kovid potvrde mogu služiti kao propusnice jer ne prenose zarazu. Ovo istraživanje dodatni je kako programi cijepljenja protiv Covid-19 bolesti ne mogu osigurati zaustavljenje širenja zaraze. Uostalo, to su ranije pokazali i podaci koji su pristizali iz zemalja s ranim i svobuhvatnim programima cijepljenja, kao što je Izrael.

U Hrvatskoj je sada pak posebno osjetljivo pitanje to što je ministar Vili Beroš omogućio ulazak cijepljenog medicinskog osoblja u bolnice samo uz kovid propusnice, odnosno bez brzih antigenskih testova, što otvara šansu prenošenja zaraze pacijentima. Je li to najveća ministrova greška do sada?

Istraživanje je, pojednostavljeno prepričano, u osnovi pratilo tzv. sekundarni napad zaraze u kućanstvima kroz grupu cijepljenih i necijepljenih. Utvrdili su da je kod taj sekundarni napad zaraze kod u potpunosti cijepljenih 25 posto, a kod necijepljenih 38 posto. To znači da cijepljenje smanjuje rizik širenja zaraze, ali niti blizu toliko značajno koliko se ranije vjerovalo. Istraživanje je, nadalje, utvrdilo kako se kod cijepljenih mogućnost širenja zaraze povećava s dužim vremenskim rasponom od zadnje doze cjepiva. Vrlo važan faktor utjecaja, ocijenili su u zaključku, jest interekcija virusa i domaćina u ranoj fazi infekcije jer može predodrediti putanju množenja virusa.

https://www.jutarnji.hr/vijesti/hrvatska/u-lancetu-objavljeni-rezultati-velikog-istrazivanja-covid-propusnice-nemaju-nikakvog-smisla-15114262?fbclid=IwAR1Bd4QEivBoh6Ky6EBie3xlOhleuMi7lfx8X13NGToqAflHv495XGXf-nQ

*

https://theexpose.uk/2021/11/02/worldwide-data-proves-the-highest-covid-19-case-rates-are-in-the-most-vaccinated-countries/

*