Oregonski senatorji so vložili peticijo veliki poroti (Grand Jury), v kateri trdijo, da sta Center za nadzor bolezni (CDC) in Uprava za hrano in zdravila (FDA) kršila zvezni zakon z napihovanjem podatkov o smrtnih primerih zaradi COVID-19.
Dva senatorja zvezne države Oregon, ki predstavljata ameriške državljane s strokovnim znanjem s področja medicine, prava, statistike in poročanja o mrliških listih, sta skupaj vložila uradno zahtevo za preiskavo zvezne velike porote o poročanju CDC in FDA o smrtnih primerih COVID.
Državna senatorja Kim Thatcher in Dennis Linthicum sta 16. avgusta 2021 v mestu Medford v okrožju Jackson v zvezni državi Oregon skupaj vložila uradno zahtevo za preiskavo velike porote proti Centru za nadzor in preprečevanje bolezni (CDC) ter ameriški Upravi za hrano in zdravila (FDA).
Senatorja Dennis Linthicum in Kim Thatcher
Peticija Veliki Poroti, ki ima 13 strani, je na naslovu: https://standforhealthfreedom.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/1-07122021-Formal-Grand-Jury-Petition.pdf
Uradni dopis je vseboval osem dokazov in 20 sklicev na dokazno gradivo, ki kažejo na jasno potrebo po uradni preiskavi agencij zaradi namerne kršitve.
Marca 2020 je center CDC v skladu z dokumentom, objavljenim v reviji Science, Public Health Policy, and The Law, nenadoma spremenil način evidentiranja smrtnih listov za samo eno vrsto smrti - COVID-19 - in pri tem zaobšel več zveznih zakonov. Ta hiperinflacija poročanja o mrliških listih je sprožila plaz slabšanja podatkov in uničujočih politik javnega zdravja.
Sedaj sta dva oregonska senatorja prekinila molk v ekskluzivnem poročanju o njunem pismu in peticiji, ki zahteva temeljito preiskavo. Pri projektu so več mesecev sodelovali strokovnjaki s področja znanosti, prava in javne politike.
Pismo, ki je bilo zaradi zaščite vpletenih predloženo natanko mesec dni pred javno objavo, je bilo naslovljeno na spoštovanega Scotta E. Asphauga, ameriškega tožilca za okrožje Oregon, in v njem je bilo navedeno:
"Kar smo izvedeli, je z našega zornega kota izvoljenih državnih političnih odločevalcev vredno neodvisne državne in/ali posebne zvezne preiskave velike porote. V skladu s členom 18 zakonika ZDA 3332 - Pristojnosti in dolžnosti ter sodno prakso, navedeno v uradni peticiji velike porote, spoštljivo zahtevamo, da se peticija in predhodna podporna dokumentacija predložita članom velike porote, ki jo zahtevamo, v takojšnjo obravnavo.
"Zaupanje javnosti v izvoljene uradnike, organ za zdravje v Oregonu in našo sposobnost, da vzdržljive prebivalce Oregona popeljemo skozi to krizo, se je zmanjšalo na najnižjo raven v zgodovini. Zaupanje ljudi v njihovo zmožnost, da sodelujejo pri svojem upravljanju in da jih izvoljeni uradniki slišijo, je morda najpomembnejši element za uspešno svobodno in zdravo družbo.
"Kot izvoljeni uradniki imamo zapriseženo dolžnost, da spoštujemo ustavo Združenih držav Amerike, ustavo Oregona, načela informiranega soglasja in spoštujemo svojo pravno obveznost, da ravnamo v skladu s 4. členom zakonika ZDA 18 - Zloraba kaznivega dejanja. Svojo dolžnost izpolnjujemo tako, da zahtevamo posebno preiskavo zvezne velike porote ali vsaj neodvisno preiskavo velike porote pod vodstvom državnega okrožja, ki jo skliče sodnik, o predstavljenih vprašanjih in dokaznem gradivu."
Na tem novinarskem srečanju je Leah Wilson, doktorica prava, izvršna direktorica in soustanoviteljica organizacije Stand for Health Freedom, ki je gostila nacionalno javno podpisno zborovanje, postavila razkrivajoča vprašanja, ki bi jih morale že zdavnaj postaviti osrednje medijske mreže, ki so opustile svojo dolžnost nepristranskega preiskovanja in objektivnega obveščanja javnosti.
Do danes je bilo zbranih več kot 62 200 podpisov, od tega na tisoče v Oregonu, kjer imata senatorja stalno prebivališče.
Na informativnem sestanku je sodeloval tudi Dr. Henry Ealy, vodilni raziskovalec skupine, ki je napisala recenzirane članke z naslovom "Zbiranje podatkov COVID-19, komorbidnost in zvezna zakonodaja: A Historical Retrospective" in "COVID-19: COVID COVID: "Restoring Public Trust During a Global Health Crisis" (Obnova javnega zaupanja med globalno zdravstveno krizo).
Njegovo delo je potrdilo pomembne ugotovitve o kršitvah zvezne zakonodaje s strani CDC in namernih kršitvah s strani FDA, ki jih je pred javno objavo temeljito preverilo devet odvetnikov in en sodnik ter strog strokovni pregled.
Dokumenti se uporabljajo tudi v več aktivnih sodnih postopkih, vključno s tistim, ki je bil vložen na zvezni ravni proti HHS in CDC.
Februarja 2021 je organizacija Stand for Health Freedom sprožila javno peticijo za zbiranje podpisov, s katero je od ameriških tožilcev zahtevala sklic preiskave velike porote o odzivih CDC in FDA na COVID-19 po presenetljivih razkritjih v zvezi s kršitvami zvezne zakonodaje in netočnostjo podatkov.
20 mesecev po "dveh tednih za izravnavo krivulje". Američani si zaslužijo, da vedo, kakšna je celovitost podatkov, na katere se opirajo agencije, ki oblikujejo nacionalno zdravstveno politiko in preoblikujejo strukturo ameriškega življenja.
CDC in FDA izdajata smernice, za katere trdita, da imajo moč zveznega zakona, ki vpliva na uradnike na vseh ravneh vlade, da predpisujejo nekaj, kar je ustvarila industrija, ki pri prodaji svojih eksperimentalnih in novih cepiv ni odgovorna za tveganje. Američanom se dopoveduje, da so ti izdelki edina prava pot nazaj v svobodno in odprto družbo.
Senatorja Thatcher in Linthicum pozivata Američane, naj v svojih zveznih državah sprožijo postopek velike porote in zahtevajo večjo odgovornost.
Uradne izjave:
"Zvezne agencije, kot je CDC, so v imenu 'javnega zdravja' zagrešile grozodejstva, ki so povzročila obsežno stransko škodo in spremenila družbo na načine, ki jih še vedno težko razumemo.
"Nezakonite in sporne spremembe, ki jih je CDC izvedel v mrliških listih v zvezi s COVID, uporaba lažno pozitivnih testov PCR in brezčutna brezbrižnost do pravic posameznikov ali znanosti, so privedle do goljufivih podatkov, ki so bili uporabljeni za utemeljitev obsežnih sprememb politike, ne le v Oregonu, temveč po vsej državi.
"Nočem stati ob strani in gledati, kako zatiralske agencije ogrožajo naše ustavne pravice in svoboščine, zato sem se odločil sodelovati pri teh prizadevanjih za vložitev zahteve za preiskavo velike porote. Enako varstvo po ustavi je še vedno pravica vsakega Američana."
- Kim Thatcher, senatorka zvezne države Oregon
"Jasno in preprosto: Center za nadzor bolezni CDC je marca 2020 ravnal nezakonito, kar je privedlo do teh sedanjih 'medicinskih' pooblastil, ki izhajajo iz prvotnega linča poškodovanih podatkov za mrliške liste COVID.
"Za naše zdravje in zdravje naših otrok smo odgovorni mi in ne vlada, vendar je CDC s to nezakonito lahkoto roke s čisto manipulacijo podatkov na nepredstavljive načine promoviral vladne posege z neverjetnimi politikami in ustvaril ponarejeno resničnost, ki nima mesta v svobodni družbi.
- Dennis Linthicum, državni senator v Oregonu
"Naša raziskovalna skupina COVID je namenila več kot 20.000 ur raziskovanju vseh vidikov COVID-19 in menimo, da je nujno pripraviti visokointegritetno raziskavo, ki bo izvoljenim uradnikom, odvetnikom, strokovnim organizacijam, neodvisnim medijem in javnosti omogočila ukrepanje v imenu dobrih ljudi po vsem svetu.
"Zakaj to počnem? To vprašanje si pogosto zastavim, potem pa pomislim na Simone Scott, 19-letno študentko univerze Northwestern, ki je grozljivo umrla po prejemu poskusnega cepljenja. Pomislim na Haydena Hunstabla, 12-letnika, ki si je vzel življenje med obupom zaradi izolacije od prijateljev med neučinkovitimi zaporami. In razmišljam o tem, kako je CDC kršil več zveznih zakonov, da bi napihnil število smrtnih primerov zaradi COVID-a in spodbujal brezobzirna dejanja namernega napačnega ravnanja.
"To, kar se je zgodilo od 2. tedna dalje, da se je krivulja izravnala, je narobe, in čeprav pokojnih ne moremo vrniti, lahko poskrbimo, da se jih bomo spominjali kot navdih, da bomo stvari popravili."
- Dr. Henry L. Ealy, raziskovalec, ustanovitelj Inštituta za energetsko zdravje
"Peticije veliki poroti so način, s katerim lahko vsi izvoljeni uradniki ali posamezniki pripomorejo k pospešitvi preiskave obsežnih namernih kršitev v zvezi z odzivom na COVID-19.
Delo, ki sta ga opravila senatorja iz Oregona Dennis Linthicum in Kim Thatcher, je primerna predloga, ki jo lahko uporabijo tudi drugi v svoji državi, da bi rekli "dovolj nam je" in zahtevali prave odgovore z resničnim odkritjem, da bi končali škodljive politike, ki uničujejo ZDA."
- Leah Wilson, doktorica prava, izvršna direktorica in soustanoviteljica organizacije Stand for Health Freedom
UKREPAJTE
Še vedno ni prepozno, da svoje ime dodate na naraščajoči seznam podpisov, ki zahtevajo preiskavo CDC in FDA. Zaradi pozivov Bele hiše k nezakonitim, nepotrebnim in neetičnim zdravstvenim obveznostim po ZDA je to še pomembnejše kot kdaj koli prej.
Pridružite se več kot 62.200 Američanom in podpišite uradno spletno peticijo ali pošljite besedo CDC data na številko 50457 ter s svojim glasom ustvarite vzvod za poziv k uradni preiskavi kršitev zvezne zakonodaje, ki so povzročile hiperinflacijo preštetih primerov COVID, hospitalizacij in zabeleženih smrti.
To namerno napačno ravnanje agencij, zadolženih za varovanje javnega zdravja, je utrlo pot ogromni kolateralni škodi in uničenju v Ameriki in zunaj nje.
Naš cilj je tudi pomagati ponoviti ta prizadevanja velike porote kot predlogo z voditelji v drugih državah. Od agencij za javno zdravje moramo zahtevati odgovornost, da bi zagotovili, da je celovitost podatkov za nacionalne zdravstvene politike zanesljiva in da našemu narodu ne povzroča večje škode kot koristi.
Kontaktirajte našo ekipo z elektronskim sporočilom advocates@standforhealthfreedom.com in v zadevo vpišite "Grand Jury", da vam bomo lahko pomagali in vas povezali z drugimi, ki se zavzemajo za to v vaši državi!
Prvotno je objavil Stand for Health Freedom.
Vir: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/oregon-senators-grand-jury-petition-cdc-fda-inflating-covid-death-data/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=46208037-809c-4de9-b120-ede140be6c35
*
Tožba ustavnega pravnika Rocco Galatija proti Kanadski vladi zaradi COVID-19 ukrepov: 27.8. 2021, stran 180
E/ HYPER – INFLATED, DISTORDETED TOTAL NUMBER OF CV-19 “CASES” & “DEATHS” 190. Since the on-set of the “emergency”, and into the summer of 2020, the Plaintiffs state that the total number of Covid-19 cases is the basis for almost all of the Covid-19 data including deaths in those cases, recovery from those cases, hospitalizations and ICU admissions of those cases and total active cases.177 Total case numbers are also used for other epidemiological metrics (e.g., virulence and transmission rates of Covid-19). 191. Yet the total case numbers are inflated by both RT-PRC testing and WHO coding definitions.
The Plaintiffs state that the WHO coding of cases allows ‘virus not identified’, i.e., probable cases to be counted as Covid-19 cases.178 WHO coding also inflates death data numbers by requiring all cases where Covid-19 is “probable or confirmed” to be certified as a death due to Covid-19 regardless of comorbidities. Admonishing physicians to “always apply these instructions, whether they can be considered medically correct or not.”179 193. RT-PCR was never intended as a diagnostic tool180 and is not an antigen test181. 194. The Plaintiffs state that the PCR tests are based on an arbitrary cycling number (Ct) that is not consistent among testing laboratories.182 “Cycling too much could result in false positives as background fluorescence builds up in the PCR reaction.” Tests can show positive for minute amounts of RNA that are not causing illness and for non-infectious fragments of RNA.183 RT-PCR tests cannot prove the pathogenic nature of the RNA. 195. RT-PCR tests have a specificity of 80-85%.184 This means 15-20% of the time a positive test does not indicate the presence of RNA of SARS-CoV-2, but of some other RNA source. RT-PCR testing is not reliable for SARS-CoV-2 testing.185 196. RT-PCR tests are more likely to be false positive than false negative. 186 In low prevalence countries like Canada: “Such [false positive] rates would have largeimpacts on test data when prevalence is low. Inclusion of such rates significantly alters four published analyses of population prevalence and asymptomatic ratio. The high false discovery rate that results, when prevalence is low, from false positive rates typical of RT-PCR assays of RNA viruses raises questions about the usefulness of mass testing…”10 197. The Plaintiffs state that the implications of false positive tests include the following: “There are myriad clinical and case management implications. Failure to appreciate the potential frequency of false positives and the consequent unreliability of positive test results across a range of scenarios could unnecessarily remove critical workers from service, expose uninfected individuals to greater risk of infection, delay or impede appropriate medical treatment, lead to inappropriate treatment, degrade patient care, waste personal protective equipment, waste human resources in unnecessary contact tracing, hinder the development of clinical improvements, and weaken clinical trials.”187 198. A Chinese study188 found, “In the close contacts of COVID-19 patients, nearly half or even more of the 'asymptomatic infected individuals' reported in the active nucleic acid test screening might be false positives.”1The Public Health Agency of Canada reports more than 1.4 million people have had PCR tests.190 Considering the false positive rate, especially for contact tracing, this is not a good use of our resources (both dollars and testing staff). 200. As of June 15th, 2020 the COVID “statistics” are as follows: (a) Population of Canada 2020--- 37,742,154; (b) Total number of confirmed or probable cases as of June 15th -- 99,147; (c) Therefore, 0.0026% of Canadians are testing positive; (d) 0.00021% of Canadians are dying ‘’with’’ or ‘’of COVID’’ (there is no current differentiation between death “with” or “from” COVID statistically speaking). As of June 15,2020 the national death count from covid stands at 8,175, a completely inflated and distorted number, due to levels of gross mismanagement of patient care in institutions where outbreaks are reported, and death certificate mislabelling of dying ‘’with’’ covid, as opposed to dying ‘’from’’ covid. Meanwhile, the statistics (2018) for other causes of death, according to statistics Canada, in Canada were as follows: (i) Suicides--- 3,811; (ii) influenza and pneumonia (seasonal viral respiratory illness) ---(iii) accidents (unintentional injuries) ---13,290; (iv) medical error (including medications)--- 28,000; (v) heart disease--- 53,134; (vi) cancer--- 79,536. 201. The Plaintiffs state, and fact is that the US, UK, and Italy, through their public health officials have publicly admitted that a COVID death is tallied as such, simply where the COVID virus is found, albeit inactive, and regardless of whether the patient died from another primary cause of death, such as from cancer in palliative care. Thus a senior US Health official, on April 19th,2020, Dr. Ezike, Director of Public Health, put it this way: That means, that if you were in hospice and had already been given a few weeks to live, and then you also were found to have COVID, that would be counted as a COVID death. ‘’It means technically if you died of a clear alternate cause but you had COVID at the same time, its still listed as a COVID death. Everyone who is listed as a COVID death doesn’t mean that was the cause of the death, but they had COVID at the time of death. The Plaintiffs state, and the fact is, that Canada uses the same system, mandated by the WHO, because the WHO collapsed three different ways of certifying and classifying death into one, in order to grossly inflate the number of deaths “attributable” to covid-19.
The Plaintiffs state, and the fact is, that in many jurisdictions, such as New York City, a hospital is paid much more to deal with a “COVID-death”, than a nonCOVID death. 204. The Plaintiff states, and the facts is, that the false and faulty manner and method of determining a ‘’COVID-death’’, is wholly and exclusively dictated by WHO guidelines and parroted by Chief Medical Officers in Canada, in furtherance of the WHO’s false ‘’pandemic’’, to instill baseless fears, in the WHO’s nonmedical agenda, at the control and instigation of Billionaire, Corporate, and Organizational Oligarchs, who actually control the agenda of the WHO, to effect their plan to install a New World (Economic) Order by means of economic shutdown and mandatory vaccinations and surveillance of the planet’s population. 205. From the summer of 2020 to the present, the fraud, and fraudulent misuse of the PCR testing, which accounts for the “case-counts”, and in turn the panic and justification for ALL Covid-measures continues, without the explanation to the public that: (a) The inventor of the PCR test, Nobel-Prize winner Kary Mullis, made it clear that the PCR test cannot and does not detect any virus that it can diagnose any virus but is merely a screening investigative test and that, in order to verify the existence of a virus you must: (i) Do a culture test to isolate and identify the virus; and
*
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/health-chief-accused-of-inflating-covid-hospital-admissions/
*
https://www.logicno.com/politika/sok-i-nevjerica-samo-2-hospitalizacija-bilo-je-povezano-s-covidom-u-2020-godini.html?fbclid=IwAR3i5unN44vv9RPqjweH3Oim6tJAyLOE3__m4sx7FtpxvuvPL5Bn6MXyUQ4
*
CDC priznava nizko smrtnost zaradi covid-19: http://technocracy.studio/e/technocrats-master-the-art-of-panic-and-alarmism/
*
*
https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/02/06/protect-nhs-100k-deaths/
What would you do if you found out there haven’t actually been 100,000 deaths due to Covid-19 but instead a campaign of fear that has manipulated data to trick you into thinking there have been thousands of Covid deaths per day?
*
This letter analyses and explains the large difference in European countries between offical COVID-19 deaths (within 28 days of a positive PCR test) and the probability of false positives which can create false pseudo-epidemic peaks in 'cases'. The false positive fallout disaster can be blamed on the increasing reliance on subjective scientific advice from government 'experts'. (Where ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be wise!)
*
If a child goes in the hospital, they automatically get tested for COVID. And they get counted as a COVID-hospitalized individual,” Fauci remarked. “When in fact, they may go in for a broken leg or appendicitis or something like that. So it’s overcounting the number of children who are, quote, ‘hospitalized with COVID,’ as opposed to because of COVID.”"
*
Spodaj je odgovor, ki smo ga danes, 31.12.2021, prejeli od enega služitelja Soljudem-Narodu-Ljudstvu (t.j. javnega uslužbenca) na delovnem mestu v Splošni bolnišnici Novo mesto kot odgovor na naš email, ki smo ga včeraj poslali več bolnišnicam in NIJZ-u.
*
*
150.000 smrtnih primerov Covid-19? - Angleška agencija ONS črno na belem navaja, da je v zadnjih dveh letih zaradi Covid-19 umrlo le 17.000 ljudi.
https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/17/ons-confirm-just-17000-have-died-of-covid-19/
*
WHO je definirala covid-19 smrt, če je PCR test pozitiven, ne glede na dejanski vzrok smrti: https://www.facebook.com/ines.sugar/videos/230460112604311/
To je povedala tudi dr. Logar Mateja: https://www.facebook.com/rtvslo.si/videos/381850153026666
*
Sep 18, 2021
